CITE-ITEL A dialogical synthesis of research into initial literacy teacher preparation
Login

Negotiating the territory of tertiary literacies: A case study of teacher education

Abstract

This paper reports on research into the literacies of pre-service teachers and the implications for both mapping and developing students’ literate competences. The research focussed on two questions: (i) If tertiary literacies are multiple, how do we bring these into relationship with one another and with the different discourse domains of professional life? (ii) What does development ‘look like’ in a multiliteracies environment? The research investigated the linguistic challenges of all assignments undertaken by 11 students in the first 18 months of teacher education and this paper considers howone student negotiated the challenges of three of these. Drawing on tools of register and genre within systemic functional linguistics, our paper explores the genesis of a model to encompass a wide range of assignment tasks related to academic, everyday and professional discourses of teacher education. Following this, it applies genre and register analysis to the writing produced by one student and reflects on the implications of her negotiation of these tasks. A dialogic model of development is proposed which images learning as an ability to shunt between the register demands of different domains. The student integrates sometimes competing meaning potentials through the production of a text in a particular genre. Development is construed in terms of this dialogue. The paper concludes with a discussion of the potential of the framework for both including the diverse literacies of teacher education and for exploring the kinds of learning that occurs at the intersection of (often competing) discourses.

Reference

  • Macken-Horarik, M., Devereux, L., Trimpingham-Jack, C., & Wilson, K. (2006). Negotiating the territory of tertiary literacies: A case study of teacher education. Linguistics and Education, 17, 240-257.  http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2006.11.001

Journal

Linguistics and Education

Analysis

Is this article part of a larger project or series of studies?

Does this study draw on a large, preexisting data set?

Research Approach

  • none stated

Geographic Setting

  • Australia

Institutional Context

  • University based

Certification Level

  • Not stated

Programatic Focus

  • not stated

Research Location Context

  • University

Preservice Participants

  • Undergraduates (university based program)

Preservice Sample Size

11

Duration of Data Collection

  • More than 1 year

Data Sources

  • Interviews
  • University coursework assignment (e.g. writing/project done for a grade)

Data Analysis Tools

  • Discourse analysis (conversational analysis)

Researcher Positionality

  • Inside (studying their own programs)

Research Questions

"If tertiary literacies are multiple, how do we bring these into relationship with one another? How do we capture both the specific demands of particular assignments and their semantic common ground?" (p. 241)
Is this research question explicit from the manuscript? Yes
" How do students negotiate the demands of different assignments? What does development ‘look like’ in a multiliteracies environment? How do we construe this linguistically?" (p. 242)
Is this research question explicit from the manuscript? Yes

Categories

2PTL Category: Preservice teachers own literacy (experiences and practices).

3CCE Category: Course experiences – the work that is done in a course to promote the content.

7OTH Topic: Other

Comments

Subscribe
Notify of
Please login to comment
0 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted

© 2015–2026 The University of Texas at Austin
Supported by the Office of Instructional Innovation
Web Privacy Policy | Web Accessibility Policy | Contact

The University of Texas at Austin College of Education

The Literacy Research Association provided pilot funding for portions of this project.

wpDiscuz
0
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x
| Reply
wpDiscuz
0
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x
| Reply