CITE-ITEL A dialogical synthesis of research into initial literacy teacher preparation
Login

Preservice teachers’ understanding of the language arts: Using a lens of critical literacy

Abstract

Preservice teachers are placed in educational environments to learn about teaching literacy and about literacy’s role in the English Language Arts (ELA) classroom. Of particular significance is how preservice teachers perceive and understand the varied components of language arts (i.e., reading, writing, speaking, listening, viewing, and visually representing) while observing mentor teachers. The purpose of this research was to discover which language arts preservice teachers choose to observe during their field placements, and how that might impact the teaching of critical literacy. First, the authors situate the study in our understanding of the language arts and frame it within critical literacy. Next, a description of the methods used to collect and analyze the data, including the role of constructivism and observation, is provided. The authors then describe the findings regarding what language arts were privileged and what language arts were absent in preservice teachers’ observations of classrooms. A final reflection focuses on the definitions of “language arts” and on how best to help preservice teachers recognize all of them, so they are better able to ultimately implement a comprehensive language arts program that includes the tenets of critical literacy in their classroom.

Reference

  • Bender-Slack, D., & Young, T. (2016). Preservice teachers’ understanding of the language arts: Using a lens of critical literacy. Mid-Western Educational Researcher, 28(2), 105-127.

Journal

Mid-Western Educational Researcher

Analysis

Is this article part of a larger project or series of studies?

no

Does this study draw on a large, preexisting data set?

no

Research Approach

  • Case study

Geographic Setting

  • Midwestern University

Institutional Context

  • University based

Certification Level

  • early childhood
  • Middle

Programatic Focus

  • early childhood education

Research Location Context

  • field-based methods course
  • Language arts methods

Preservice Participants

  • undergraduate preservice teachers

Preservice Sample Size

29

Other Participant Data

  • Teacher Educators

Duration of Data Collection

  • 6 weeks

Data Sources

  • assignments
  • class assignment reflections
  • Observations
  • Preservice teacher classroom observation notes
  • Syllabi from University courses

Data Analysis Tools

  • Content analysis

Researcher Positionality

  • inside (staying their own students)

Research Questions

"Which language arts did our preservice teachers choose to observe during their field placements, and how might that impact teaching critical literacy?" (p.106).
Is this research question explicit from the manuscript? Yes

Categories

4FIS Category: Field Experiences: inside schools

3CCE Category: Course experiences – the work that is done in a course to promote the content.

2PTI Category: Preservice teacher identity, knowledge, beliefs, attitudes, and/or orientation (ikbao) toward literacy or the teaching of literacy.

1TEP Category: Teacher educator practices.

7CRL Topic: Critical literacy

Comments

Subscribe
Notify of
Please login to comment
0 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted

© 2015–2026 The University of Texas at Austin
Supported by the Office of Instructional Innovation
Web Privacy Policy | Web Accessibility Policy | Contact

The University of Texas at Austin College of Education

The Literacy Research Association provided pilot funding for portions of this project.

wpDiscuz
0
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x
| Reply
wpDiscuz
0
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x
| Reply