CITE-ITEL A dialogical synthesis of research into initial literacy teacher preparation
Login

Missed opportunities, misunderstandings, and misgivings: A case study analysis of three beginning English teachers’ attempts at authentic discussion with adolescents in a synchronous CMC environment

Abstract

Despite the abundance of research reporting authentic, student-centered classroom discussion helps to increase engagement with literary texts and deepen students’ understanding of texts, little authentic, student-centered discussion actually occurs in secondary US English classrooms. Reasons for this vary, but some classroom language researchers suggest teachers find it difficult to implement non-recitation frames for discussion, even when they desire to do so. Replacing a traditional classroom discourse pattern with a less familiar model is a complex task. Teachers may need opportunities to practice less familiar social and communicative behaviors. The Web Pen Pals project described in this paper provided an opportunity for beginning English teachers to practice authentic discussion about literature in a synchronous CMC environment with adolescents. The researcher employed case study analysis of three beginning teachers to answer the following question: How do preservice English teachers discuss literature online with middle school students? Of particular interest was topic management; researchers suggest characteristics of the synchronous chat medium support topic negotiation rather than control by any one user. Findings revealed that beginning teachers may bring traditional discourse expectations about teacher-student roles in discussion to CMC tasks, which may work against the development of authentic discussion in a CMC environment.

Reference

  • Groenke, S. (2010). Missed opportunities, misunderstandings, and misgivings: A case study analysis of three beginning English teachers’ attempts at authentic discussion with adolescents in a synchronous CMC environment. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 18(3), 387-414. 

Journal

Journal of Technology and Teacher Education

Analysis

Is this article part of a larger project or series of studies?

no

Does this study draw on a large, preexisting data set?

no

Research Approach

  • Case study
  • Qualitiative

Geographic Setting

  • Tennessee

Institutional Context

  • University based

Certification Level

  • Secondary

Programatic Focus

  • Literacy Education
  • technology

Research Location Context

  • Secondary school

Preservice Participants

  • Not stated

Preservice Sample Size

3

Duration of Data Collection

  • Academic Semester

Data Sources

  • Interviews
  • Reflective journals
  • retrospective notes
  • Transcriptions

Data Analysis Tools

  • Case study analysis
  • cross-case analysis
  • Discourse analysis (conversational analysis)
  • Qualitative Analysis

Researcher Positionality

  • inside (staying their own students)

Research Questions

How do preservice English teachers discuss literature online with middle school students?
Is this research question explicit from the manuscript? Yes

Categories

2PTI Category: Preservice teacher identity, knowledge, beliefs, attitudes, and/or orientation (ikbao) toward literacy or the teaching of literacy.

4FOS Category: Field Experiences: outside schools (community focused)

7DDA Topic: Discussion/Dialogic approaches

7DLT Topic: Digital literacies

Comments

Subscribe
Notify of
Please login to comment
0 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted

© 2015–2026 The University of Texas at Austin
Supported by the Office of Instructional Innovation
Web Privacy Policy | Web Accessibility Policy | Contact

The University of Texas at Austin College of Education

The Literacy Research Association provided pilot funding for portions of this project.

wpDiscuz
0
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x
| Reply
wpDiscuz
0
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x
| Reply