CITE-ITEL A dialogical synthesis of research into initial literacy teacher preparation
Login

Making room for discomfort: Exploring critical literacy and practice in a teacher education classroom

Abstract

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to relay and discuss the experiences of a teacher educator teaching critical literacy to preservice teacher candidates immediately following the US presidential election in 2016. In a time of increasing polarization in the USA, teachers and teacher educators have unique opportunities to create honest spaces for dialogue, but developing classrooms that can serve as these spaces is not an easy task. Design/methodology/approach – This paper is a self-study practitioner narrative of a teacher educator teaching a secondary literacy course. Findings – The paper discusses the importance of addressing critical literacy in the context of particular historical moments and as more sustained, engaged work that makes room for minority voices that may not be heard across particular settings. The findings prompt teachers and teacher educators to consider whose voices are present, absent and valued during difficult conversations. Originality/value – Making room for uncomfortable dialogues in preservice teacher education classrooms can transform the ways in which teacher candidates (and their future students) engage with written and nontraditional texts in the world around them. Promoting spaces for critical, authentic and honest dialogue requires teacher educators to model the willingness to move beyond their own comfort zones and interrogate their own deeply help beliefs. This paper is evidence of engaged self-reflection, a necessary part of transformative practice related to critical literacy.

Reference

  • Hsieh, B. (2017). Making room for discomfort: Exploring critical literacy and practice in a teacher education classroom. English Teaching: Practice & Critique, 16(3), 290–302. https://doi.org/10.1108/ETPC-05-2017-0086

Journal

English Teaching: Practice and Critique

Analysis

Is this article part of a larger project or series of studies?

no

Does this study draw on a large, preexisting data set?

no

Research Approach

  • practitioner research
  • Self-Study

Geographic Setting

  • California

Institutional Context

  • University based

Certification Level

  • English Education
  • Secondary

Programatic Focus

  • English
  • Urban Education

Research Location Context

  • Content area literacy course
  • University

Preservice Participants

  • Not stated

Preservice Sample Size

23

Duration of Data Collection

  • 1 semester

Data Sources

  • course discussions
  • reflections

Data Analysis Tools

  • Qualitative Analysis

Researcher Positionality

  • inside (staying their own students)
  • Inside (studying their own practices)

Research Questions

What are "ways to honor [a teacher educator's beliefs, support students in ways consistent with critical literacy and facilitate conversations that might push our learning community to think beyond our individual perspectives"?
Is this research question explicit from the manuscript? Combination

Categories

1TEP Category: Teacher educator practices.

3CCT Category: Course content -- Content of instruction (including TE's teaching with technology) and the experiences in the course that relate to this content.

7CRL Topic: Critical literacy

7CDL Topic: Content area literacy

7SIU Topic: Sociocultural Influences and Understandings

7ACT Topic: Activism

7IAD: Inquiry and Advocacy

Comments

Subscribe
Notify of
Please login to comment
0 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted

© 2015–2026 The University of Texas at Austin
Supported by the Office of Instructional Innovation
Web Privacy Policy | Web Accessibility Policy | Contact

The University of Texas at Austin College of Education

The Literacy Research Association provided pilot funding for portions of this project.

wpDiscuz
0
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x
| Reply
wpDiscuz
0
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x
| Reply