CITE-ITEL A dialogical synthesis of research into initial literacy teacher preparation
Login

Journaling from internship to practice teaching

Abstract

This case study aims to discover how journal writing promotes critical reflectivity over time. Six non-native pre-service teachers of English as a Second Language (TESL) in an undergraduate program in Hong Kong took part in a 12-month study from the time they took Internship, which entailed a 2-week placement, to the time they completed Practice Teaching, which entailed a 3-week placement. Before the commencement of the Internship program and after the completion of the Practice Teaching course, the teachers were assigned to write about successful English teachers, understanding and expectations of teaching English in the context of local secondary schools. During the five weeks of teaching practicum, the teachers made daily journal entries freely on any topics they wanted. All entries were coded for topics and reflective traits, and further analyzed for changes in content. Results show that while most reflective traits in the free journal entries were located in the area of evaluating teaching, those in the assigned entries concentrated on theories of teaching. Post-coding interviews were held to allow the teachers to verify the codings and interpretations. Discussion in the interviews cross-validated the findings that the six teachers wrote reflectively and that they became more reflective towards the end of the courses, indicating less simplicity in their understanding of the multitude of issues of teaching. Such findings suggest that journal writing as a coursework assignment in pre-service teacher education program fosters teachers’ critical reflectivity over time and promotes understanding of the nature, theories, and praxis of teaching.

Reference

  • Tsang, W. (2003). Journaling from internship to practice teaching. Reflective Practice, 4(2), 221-240.

Journal

Reflective Practice

Analysis

Is this article part of a larger project or series of studies?

no

Does this study draw on a large, preexisting data set?

no

Research Approach

  • "longitudinal": across varying classes over time
  • Case study
  • Qualitiative

Geographic Setting

  • Hong Kong

Institutional Context

  • University based

Certification Level

  • ESL Endorsement

Programatic Focus

  • ELLs

Research Location Context

  • field-based methods course
  • student teaching placement schools
  • University

Preservice Participants

  • Undergraduates (university based program)

Preservice Sample Size

6

Duration of Data Collection

  • 1 year

Data Sources

  • class assignment reflections
  • journal entries
  • lesson plans

Data Analysis Tools

  • coding to a prior categories
  • Content analysis

Researcher Positionality

  • inside (staying their own students)

Research Questions

"What reflective traits do participants demonstrate in their writing?" (p.4)
Is this research question explicit from the manuscript? Yes
"What are the changes, if any, in participants’ reflection patterns over a period of twelve months?" (p.4)
Is this research question explicit from the manuscript? Yes
"What has actually changed over the twelve months, behavior, knowledge, or otherwise?" (p. 4)
Is this research question explicit from the manuscript? Yes

Categories

2PTL Category: Preservice teachers own literacy (experiences and practices).

3CCT Category: Course content -- Content of instruction (including TE's teaching with technology) and the experiences in the course that relate to this content.

7TRN Topic: Transitions

Comments

Subscribe
Notify of
Please login to comment
0 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted

© 2015–2026 The University of Texas at Austin
Supported by the Office of Instructional Innovation
Web Privacy Policy | Web Accessibility Policy | Contact

The University of Texas at Austin College of Education

The Literacy Research Association provided pilot funding for portions of this project.

wpDiscuz
0
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x
| Reply
wpDiscuz
0
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x
| Reply