CITE-ITEL A dialogical synthesis of research into initial literacy teacher preparation
Login

Inviting Teacher Candidates into Book Talks: Supporting a Culture of Lifelong Reading

Abstract

This article describes our collaborative inquiry, three teacher educators/researchers of literacy from different institutions who shared a concern about how few teacher candidates in our programs neither viewed themselves as readers nor possessed a love of reading, qualities we view as key to supporting all children as lifelong readers, writers, and communicators. In this paper, we share how we took action and studied the use of book talks in our programs to support a culture of lifelong reading among our teacher candidates and to offer possibilities for candidates’ future teaching experiences. The study took place over two years. In phase one, we studied groups of our candidates from our literacy/ language arts methods courses as they engaged in book talks. In phase two, we followed-up with nine of the participating candidates, three in each institution, during student teaching or their first year of teaching to explore how the book talk experience influenced their early teaching efforts. Findings show that book talks and the culture created in reading for pleasure and purpose made a positive impression on the way candidates viewed what it means to be a reader and their role as future teachers of literacy. In addition, we found many challenges that impeded candidates’ efforts to act on their visions of using book talks and developing independent readers in their classrooms.

Reference

  • Bixler, J., Smith, S., & Henderson, S. (2013). Inviting teacher candidates into book talks: Supporting a culture of lifelong reading.” Reading Horizons 52 (3), 233–254.

Journal

Reading Horizons

Analysis

Is this article part of a larger project or series of studies?

no

Does this study draw on a large, preexisting data set?

no

Research Approach

  • Qualitiative

Geographic Setting

  • northeast US
  • Southeast of the United States

Institutional Context

  • University based

Certification Level

  • Elementary

Programatic Focus

  • not stated

Research Location Context

  • Book Club
  • field-based methods course

Preservice Participants

  • Not stated

Preservice Sample Size

30

Duration of Data Collection

  • 2 years

Data Sources

  • Audio recordings
  • Blog
  • email correspondence
  • Reflective journals
  • Self-Assessment of Proficiency to Perform Reading Tasks (SPPRT; Clark & Read, 2012)
  • Survey
  • Transcriptions
  • Video

Data Analysis Tools

  • Qualitative Analysis

Researcher Positionality

  • Inside (studying their own practices)

Research Questions

How did our teacher candidates define what it means to be a reader? (p. 240)
Is this research question explicit from the manuscript? Yes
How do their definitions compare to their actions as readers engaged in book talk? (p. 240)
Is this research question explicit from the manuscript? Yes
Did our candidates’ visions of what it means to be a reader, their actions as readers, and their role as teachers to support lifelong readers evolve over time/experience? (p. 240)
Is this research question explicit from the manuscript? Yes

Categories

2PTL Category: Preservice teachers own literacy (experiences and practices).

3CCE Category: Course experiences – the work that is done in a course to promote the content.

2PTI Category: Preservice teacher identity, knowledge, beliefs, attitudes, and/or orientation (ikbao) toward literacy or the teaching of literacy.

6GLP Category: Graduates literacy practices in classrooms

Comments

Subscribe
Notify of
Please login to comment
1 Comment
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Chris Ham
Admin
Chris Ham
6 years ago

The article has been reviewed by Dr. Bixler.

0

© 2015–2026 The University of Texas at Austin
Supported by the Office of Instructional Innovation
Web Privacy Policy | Web Accessibility Policy | Contact

The University of Texas at Austin College of Education

The Literacy Research Association provided pilot funding for portions of this project.

wpDiscuz
1
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x
| Reply
wpDiscuz
1
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x
| Reply