CITE-ITEL A dialogical synthesis of research into initial literacy teacher preparation
Login

How do student teachers elicit their mentor teachers’ practical knowledge?

Abstract

The present study focuses on how student-teachers attempt to elicit the practical knowledge of the mentor teachers who supervise their practical training. Having access to the practical knowledge of their mentors means, among other things, that student-teachers have access to the cognitions underlying teaching that can help them to understand their mentors' teaching style, advice, and feedback. The analysis of 29 interviews with student-teachers revealed three self-initiated activities for this access: (1) observing a mentor's lesson; (2) asking specific questions about lessons observed; and (3) discussing the student's lesson or teaching and education in general. Not all the activities mentioned by the student-teachers elicited what is called 'practical knowledge' in the literature. As practical knowledge is an important element of the learning-to-teach process, it was concluded that the stimulation of activities aimed at exploring this knowledge could make a valuable contribution to teacher education. The instruments used in the research on teacher knowledge and beliefs could be helpful for attaining this objective. Implications of this research for teacher education and suggestions for further research are presented.

Reference

  • Zanting, A., Verloop, N., & Vermunt, J. D. (2003). How do student teachers elicit their mentor teachers' practical knowledge? Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 9(3), 197-211.

Journal

Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice

Analysis

Is this article part of a larger project or series of studies?

yes

Does this study draw on a large, preexisting data set?

no

Research Approach

  • none stated

Geographic Setting

  • Netherlands

Institutional Context

  • University based

Certification Level

  • High School (ages 15-18)
  • Secondary

Programatic Focus

  • English
  • foreign language
  • History
  • Mathematics
  • Science
  • Social Studies

Research Location Context

  • University

Preservice Participants

  • Post bachs (university based program)
  • Postgraduate teacher education programme

Preservice Sample Size

29

Duration of Data Collection

  • one sitting

Data Sources

  • Audio recordings
  • Interviews
  • Transcriptions

Data Analysis Tools

  • coding (non-specific)
  • Coding with inter-rater reliability check
  • Constant comparative analysis
  • grounded theory

Researcher Positionality

  • not stated

Research Questions

"In what way do student-teachers of their own accord attempt to access the practical knowledge of the mentor teachers who supervise their practical training?" (p. 201)
Is this research question explicit from the manuscript? Yes

Categories

1TES Category: Teacher educator practices focused on surrounding external/political pressures.

4FIS Category: Field Experiences: inside schools

4CTM Category: Cooperating/mentor teachers

7REP Topic: Reflection and the reflective practitioner

7CHG Topic: Coaching

2PTP Category: Preservice teachers teaching practices (including shifts in teaching practices as a function of growth or context).

2PTI Category: Preservice teacher identity, knowledge, beliefs, attitudes, and/or orientation (ikbao) toward literacy or the teaching of literacy.

Comments

Subscribe
Notify of
Please login to comment
0 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted

© 2015–2026 The University of Texas at Austin
Supported by the Office of Instructional Innovation
Web Privacy Policy | Web Accessibility Policy | Contact

The University of Texas at Austin College of Education

The Literacy Research Association provided pilot funding for portions of this project.

wpDiscuz
0
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x
| Reply
wpDiscuz
0
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x
| Reply