CITE-ITEL A dialogical synthesis of research into initial literacy teacher preparation
Login

From Writing Methods to Student Teaching: Vision Development and the Implementation of Conceptual and Practical Tools by Preservice Teachers

Abstract

Design of Study: We undertook a one-year, multiple-case study (Merriam, 1988) across two settings, a 16-week writing methods course, and the student teaching placement. We collected data from all preservice teachers (N = 53) enrolled in the course. We then purposefully selected seven preservice teachers to follow into their student teaching experience. We sought to “discover, understand, [and] gain insight” (Merriam, 1988, p. 48) into how preservice teachers utilized course knowledge in their student-teaching experience. For the seven cases, we selected preservice teachers that demonstrated strong to average academic ability in the methods class and were student teaching in various grade levels. We present the findings of two cases in this study.

Reference

  • Morgan, D. N., Zimmerman, B. S., Kidder-Brown, M. K., & Dunn, K. (2011). From writing methods to student teaching: Vision development and the implementation of conceptual and practical tools by preservice teachers. In Dunston, P. J., Gambrell, L. B., Headley, K., Fullerton, S. K., Stecker, P. M., Gillis, V. R, & Bates, C. C. (Eds.), 60th Literacy Research Association Yearbook. (pp. 100-112). Oak Creek, WI: Literacy Research Association Conference.

Journal

Yearbook of the National Reading Conference

Analysis

Is this article part of a larger project or series of studies?

no

Does this study draw on a large, preexisting data set?

no

Research Approach

  • Case study

Geographic Setting

  • Ohio

Institutional Context

  • University based

Certification Level

  • early childhood

Programatic Focus

  • not stated

Research Location Context

  • student teaching placement schools
  • University

Preservice Participants

  • Undergraduates (university based program)

Preservice Sample Size

2

Duration of Data Collection

Data Sources

  • fieldnotes
  • Interviews
  • Observations
  • University coursework assignment (e.g. writing/project done for a grade)

Data Analysis Tools

  • Constant comparative analysis
  • open coding and examined for emergent themes

Researcher Positionality

  • inside (staying their own students)
  • Inside (studying their own programs)

Research Questions

(a) How do preservice teachers describe writing experiences prior to taking a methods course on the teaching of writing?,
Is this research question explicit from the manuscript? Yes
(b) What pedagogical knowledge do preservice teachers identify as helpful to their own learning as writers and how do they envision using that knowledge in their student teaching experience?
Is this research question explicit from the manuscript? Unknown
(c) How do preservice teachers appropriate their knowledge learned in the methods course into their student-teaching experience?
Is this research question explicit from the manuscript? Unknown

Categories

2PTP Category: Preservice teachers teaching practices (including shifts in teaching practices as a function of growth or context).

3CCT Category: Course content -- Content of instruction (including TE's teaching with technology) and the experiences in the course that relate to this content.

4FIS Category: Field Experiences: inside schools

6GLP Category: Graduates literacy practices in classrooms

6GIL Category: Graduates impact on students’ literacy.

7WTG Topic: Writing

7CLT Topic: Children's Literature

7TRN Topic: Transitions

2PTI Category: Preservice teacher identity, knowledge, beliefs, attitudes, and/or orientation (ikbao) toward literacy or the teaching of literacy.

Comments

Subscribe
Notify of
Please login to comment
0 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted

© 2015–2026 The University of Texas at Austin
Supported by the Office of Instructional Innovation
Web Privacy Policy | Web Accessibility Policy | Contact

The University of Texas at Austin College of Education

The Literacy Research Association provided pilot funding for portions of this project.

wpDiscuz
0
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x
| Reply
wpDiscuz
0
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x
| Reply