CITE-ITEL A dialogical synthesis of research into initial literacy teacher preparation
Login

Development of Pedagogical Knowledge Related to Teaching At-Risk Students: How Do Inservice Teachers and Preservice Teachers Compare?

Abstract

This study examined the development of pedagogical knowledge of preservice and inservice teachers as they implemented newly learned assessment and instructional strategies with at-risk readers in clinical settings. The preservice teachers worked in pairs to tutor children during the regular semester at a university reading clinic; the inservice teachers worked for four days a week for six weeks in a special reading academy. Four stages of development emerged from the examination of the reflective responses of teachers that they wrote after each tutoring sessions with the at-risk readers. The stages identified were: novice, advance beginner, competent, and proficient.

Reference

  • Allen, D., & Swearingen, R. (2002). Development of Pedagogical Knowledge Related to Teaching At-Risk Students: How Do Inservice Teachers and Preservice Teachers Compare?  Reading Horizons, 43(1), 49-60.

Journal

Reading Horizons

Analysis

Is this article part of a larger project or series of studies?

no

Does this study draw on a large, preexisting data set?

no

Research Approach

  • Mixed Design/Descriptive

Geographic Setting

  • a suburban community outside of a large urban city in Texas
  • Large state university in Missouri
  • Texas

Institutional Context

  • University based

Certification Level

  • Elementary
  • Special Education

Programatic Focus

  • Elementary

Research Location Context

  • Literacy methods course
  • University Reading Clinic

Preservice Participants

  • Undergraduates (university based program)

Preservice Sample Size

29

Other Participant Data

  • Inservice Teachers
  • Students in tutorial setting
  • University Professor

Duration of Data Collection

  • Academic Semester

Data Sources

  • home visit reports
  • instructor feedback
  • Interviews
  • lesson plans
  • Observations
  • Online response
  • reflections
  • tutoring reports

Data Analysis Tools

  • coding (emergent categories)
  • Triangulation

Researcher Positionality

  • Outside (not directly invested in the program or operations)

Research Questions

"What stages of development do preservice and inservice teachers experience when they work in an inquiry-based instructional model with at-risk readers?" (p. 51)
Is this research question explicit from the manuscript? Yes
"What is the nature of these stages?" (p. 51)
Is this research question explicit from the manuscript? Yes
"How do the stages of pedagogical concepts differ between the two groups of teachers?" (p. 51)
Is this research question explicit from the manuscript? Yes

Categories

2PTP Category: Preservice teachers teaching practices (including shifts in teaching practices as a function of growth or context).

4FIS Category: Field Experiences: inside schools

6GLP Category: Graduates literacy practices in classrooms

7PTB Topic: Preservice teacher beliefs about students, families communities etc

7TUT Topic: Tutoring

Comments

Subscribe
Notify of
Please login to comment
1 Comment
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Chris Ham
Admin
Chris Ham
6 years ago

The article has been reviewed and corrected by Dr. Allen (first author).

0

© 2015–2026 The University of Texas at Austin
Supported by the Office of Instructional Innovation
Web Privacy Policy | Web Accessibility Policy | Contact

The University of Texas at Austin College of Education

The Literacy Research Association provided pilot funding for portions of this project.

wpDiscuz
1
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x
| Reply
wpDiscuz
1
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x
| Reply