CITE-ITEL A dialogical synthesis of research into initial literacy teacher preparation
Login

Applying Social Cognitive Theory to Position Literacy Teacher Candidates as Self-Described Learners and Teachers: Formatted in PechaKucha “Manuscript Style”

Abstract

The article explores, explore teacher candidates as self-regulated learners as well as teachers. Topics discussed, include ways through which self-regulated literacy teacher education candidates learn and teach, relationship between teacher candidates self-regulation of learning and teaching, and issues associated with education technology.

Reference

  • Richards, J. C. . (2018). Applying Social Cognitive Theory to Position Literacy Teacher Candidates as Self-Described Learners and Teachers: Formatted in PechaKucha “Manuscript Style.” Literacy Practice & Research, 44(1), 26–31. Retrieved from http://search.ebscohost.com.ezproxy.lib.utexas.edu/login.aspx?direct=true&db=eue&AN=134589278&site=ehost-live

Journal

Literacy Practice & Research

Analysis

Is this article part of a larger project or series of studies?

no

Does this study draw on a large, preexisting data set?

no

Research Approach

  • Case study
  • exploratory case study

Geographic Setting

Institutional Context

  • University based

Certification Level

  • Elementary

Programatic Focus

Research Location Context

  • Elementary school

Preservice Participants

Preservice Sample Size

12

Duration of Data Collection

  • 1 semester

Data Sources

  • Classroom Discussion
  • Observations
  • reflections

Data Analysis Tools

  • Case study analysis
  • Constant comparative analysis

Researcher Positionality

  • Inside (preservice/inservice teacher studying their own practice)
  • inside (staying their own students)

Research Questions

In What Ways Did The Teacher Candidates Perceive Matriculating in a Course in Which They Were Positioned As Self-Regulated Learners and Teachers Influence Their Professional Development?
Is this research question explicit from the manuscript? Yes
A Priori Question #2: In what ways did the teacher can- didates think their writing lessons influenced their tutee’s writing abilities, vocabulary development, sense of agency, and motivation for writing?
Is this research question explicit from the manuscript? Unknown
A Priori Question #3: What specific activities and experi- ences (i.e., catalysts) did the teacher candidates perceive as most beneficial in positioning and supporting their self-directed learning and teaching?
Is this research question explicit from the manuscript? Unknown

Categories

1TEC Category: Teacher educator practices focused on institutional structures, constraints and pressures.

2PTI Category: Preservice teacher identity, knowledge, beliefs, attitudes, and/or orientation (ikbao) toward literacy or the teaching of literacy.

3CCE Category: Course experiences – the work that is done in a course to promote the content.

4FIS Category: Field Experiences: inside schools

7IAB Topic: Identity and Beliefs

7REP Topic: Reflection and the reflective practitioner

7TUT Topic: Tutoring

7WTG Topic: Writing

Comments

Subscribe
Notify of
Please login to comment
0 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted

© 2015–2026 The University of Texas at Austin
Supported by the Office of Instructional Innovation
Web Privacy Policy | Web Accessibility Policy | Contact

The University of Texas at Austin College of Education

The Literacy Research Association provided pilot funding for portions of this project.

wpDiscuz
0
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x
| Reply
wpDiscuz
0
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x
| Reply