CITE-ITEL A dialogical synthesis of research into initial literacy teacher preparation
Login

(Re)conceptualizing Content Area Literacy: Encouraging pre-service and in-service teachers to Explore Interdisciplinary Instruction

Abstract

Study begins on page 144.   From the introduction: This study sought to investigate how pre- and in-service teachers responded when we introduced interdisciplinary unit planning in our respective university content area literacy methods courses. Two essential notions from the content area and adolescent literacy research inspired us in this endeavor. First, Morse (2008) asserts that literacy strategies need to be taught in meaningful ways across the disciplines in our secondary schools. Second, adolescents deserve and need engaging, high-interest, critical, authentic and inter-textual curriculum coupled with multiple literacy opportunities (Moore, Bean, Birdyshaw, & Rycik, 1999). As teacher educators in secondary literacy education, we concur with these notions and think one solution to achieve this goal is the implementation of interdisciplinary unit planning in secondary education (Daniels & Zemelman, 2004).

Reference

  • Frambaugh-Kritzer, C., Stolle, E.P. (2011). (Re)conceptualizing Content Area Literacy: Encouraging pre-service and in-service teachers to Explore Interdisciplinary Instruction. In Dunston, P. J., Gambrell, L. B., Headley, K., Fullerton, S. K., Stecker, P. M., Gillis, V. R, & Bates, C. C. (Eds.), 60th Literacy Research Association Yearbook. (pp. 144-155). Oak Creek, WI: Literacy Research Association Conference.

Journal

Yearbook of the National Reading Conference

Analysis

Is this article part of a larger project or series of studies?

yes

Does this study draw on a large, preexisting data set?

no

Research Approach

  • Qualitiative
  • Self-Study

Geographic Setting

  • midwest
  • Southwestern United States

Institutional Context

  • University based

Certification Level

  • Secondary

Programatic Focus

  • interdisciplinary liteacy

Research Location Context

  • University

Preservice Participants

  • Undergraduates (university based program)

Preservice Sample Size

45

Duration of Data Collection

  • 4 to 6 months

Data Sources

  • email correspondence
  • fieldnotes
  • Observations
  • Reading Responses
  • retrospective notes
  • Survey
  • University coursework assignment (e.g. writing/project done for a grade)

Data Analysis Tools

  • coding (open to axial to selective

Researcher Positionality

  • inside (staying their own students)

Research Questions

"How does interdisciplinary unit planning help pre- and in-service teachers understand content area literacy?" (this was the second of three research questions and the only on addressed in this report)
Is this research question explicit from the manuscript? Yes

Categories

1TEP Category: Teacher educator practices.

2PTP Category: Preservice teachers teaching practices (including shifts in teaching practices as a function of growth or context).

3CCE Category: Course experiences – the work that is done in a course to promote the content.

6GLP Category: Graduates literacy practices in classrooms

7REP Topic: Reflection and the reflective practitioner

7CDL Topic: Content area literacy

7ADL Topic: Adolescents

1TEI Category: Teacher educator identity, knowledge, beliefs, attitudes, and/or orientation (ikbao) to literacy or teacher preparation in literacy.

2PTI Category: Preservice teacher identity, knowledge, beliefs, attitudes, and/or orientation (ikbao) toward literacy or the teaching of literacy.

4CTM Category: Cooperating/mentor teachers

Comments

Subscribe
Notify of
Please login to comment
0 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted

© 2015–2026 The University of Texas at Austin
Supported by the Office of Instructional Innovation
Web Privacy Policy | Web Accessibility Policy | Contact

The University of Texas at Austin College of Education

The Literacy Research Association provided pilot funding for portions of this project.

wpDiscuz
0
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x
| Reply
wpDiscuz
0
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x
| Reply