Teaching the distinctive language of science: An integrated and scaffolded approach for pre-service teachers
Abstract
To learn science and demonstrate science learning, school students must bridge the gap between everyday use of language and image and the specialised use of language and image needed to achieve science curriculum outcomes. Pre-service teachers studying at a regional Australian university were shown how to help their future students bridge this gap. A transdisciplinary model was used to demonstrate the teaching of specialised science literacies integrated with the teaching of science in the middle school years, resulting in high levels of engagement, more effective use of learning time, and valuable opportunities for teacher educator professional learning.
Reference
Feez, S., & Quinn, F. (2017). Teaching the distinctive language of science: An integrated and scaffolded approach for pre-service teachers. Teaching and Teacher Education, 65, 192-204.
Journal
Teaching and Teacher Education
Analysis
Is this article part of a larger project or series of studies?
no
Does this study draw on a large, preexisting data set?
no
Research Approach
- Action Research
- Case study
Geographic Setting
Institutional Context
Certification Level
Programatic Focus
- English
- Integrated curriculum
- not stated
- Science
Research Location Context
- Integrated science and English
- middle school
Preservice Participants
- undergraduate preservice teachers
Preservice Sample Size
Other Participant Data
Duration of Data Collection
Data Sources
- assignments
- Course project
- Observations
- Written reflections
Data Analysis Tools
Researcher Positionality
Research Questions
How can disciplinary boundaries - isolating science
education from literacy education - in a traditional PST education
programme be overcome?
Is this research question explicit from the manuscript? No
How might the design of teaching sequences that integrate science education and disciplinary literacies be modelled for PSTs?
Is this research question explicit from the manuscript? No