CITE-ITEL A dialogical synthesis of research into initial literacy teacher preparation
Login

Social justice, pedagogy and multiliteracies: Developing communities of practice for teacher education

Abstract

Celebrating and responding equitably to diversity have become increasingly essential for teachers’ work in the new millennium, which is characterized by shifting local and global communities. Aiming to broaden conceptions of teacher education within a predominantly ‘back to basics’ literacy environment, this article draws on selected results from a qualitative study underpinned by the metaphor of communities of practice (Wenger, 1998; Wenger et al., 2002). Conducted in Western Australia, the project involved a small group of pre- service teachers using a pedagogy of ‘Multiliteracies’ (The New London Group, 2000) in face-to-face and on-line settings to construct understandings about literacy learning and teaching. This article focuses on one pre-service teacher, who engaged with multiple discources and communities of practice on the journey of becoming a professional teacher. Conclusions call for a re-conceptualization of teaching communities and sustainable innovation across teaching education to encourage critical and socially just literacy learning.

Reference

  • Cumming-Potvin, W. (2009). Social justice, pedagogy and multiliteracies: Developing communities of practice for teacher education. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 34(3).
    http://dx.doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2009v34n3.4

Journal

Australian Journal of Teacher Education

Analysis

Is this article part of a larger project or series of studies?

no

Does this study draw on a large, preexisting data set?

no

Research Approach

  • Case study
  • interpretive
  • Qualitiative

Geographic Setting

  • Australia

Institutional Context

  • University based

Certification Level

  • Primary (UK term)

Programatic Focus

  • not stated

Research Location Context

  • University

Preservice Participants

  • Undergraduates (university based program)

Preservice Sample Size

1

Other Participant Data

  • four of the students' children

Duration of Data Collection

  • More than 1 year

Data Sources

  • email correspondence
  • Focus group interviews
  • Interviews
  • online discussions
  • shared literacy events

Data Analysis Tools

  • Case study analysis
  • Discourse analysis (conversational analysis)
  • Qualitative Analysis

Researcher Positionality

  • inside (staying their own students)

Research Questions

The researcher stated: "This article aims to extend knowledge about teaching and learning literacy and promote discussion about innovation in teacher education." The only questions explicitly stated were asked of the participant. In the findings section, her answers were reported and additional data was included by the researcher in response to her answers. 1) How would you define literacy? 2) As a future teacher, what do you think is important for the teaching and learning of literacy in relation to primary-school aged children?
Is this research question explicit from the manuscript? No

Categories

2PTI Category: Preservice teacher identity, knowledge, beliefs, attitudes, and/or orientation (ikbao) toward literacy or the teaching of literacy.

7TRN Topic: Transitions

7TSJ Topic: Teaching for social justice

2PTP Category: Preservice teachers teaching practices (including shifts in teaching practices as a function of growth or context).

7REP Topic: Reflection and the reflective practitioner

6GCP Category: Graduates career paths

7SIU Topic: Sociocultural Influences and Understandings

7ACT Topic: Activism

7IAD: Inquiry and Advocacy

Comments

Subscribe
Notify of
Please login to comment
0 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted

© 2015–2026 The University of Texas at Austin
Supported by the Office of Instructional Innovation
Web Privacy Policy | Web Accessibility Policy | Contact

The University of Texas at Austin College of Education

The Literacy Research Association provided pilot funding for portions of this project.

wpDiscuz
0
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x
| Reply
wpDiscuz
0
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x
| Reply