CITE-ITEL A dialogical synthesis of research into initial literacy teacher preparation
Login

Cross-age, cross-content modeling: Improving teacher credential candidate skill at adapting and modifying

Abstract

A team of three instructors in a collaborative teacher credential program, each representing three departments (Elementary, Secondary, and Special Education), modeled concrete, implementable literacy activities that spanned grade levels, content areas, and ability levels to examine if modeling in such a manner would yield better candidate understanding of, and skill in, adapting and modifying classroom instruction. We included a metacognitive narrative, explicitly deconstructing our reasoning for modeling the adaptations and modifications we made in our literacy activities, in order to help teacher candidates find more relevance in those examples being modeled. The study used a pre and post-survey and a culminating assignment to determine the efficacy of these theory-into-adapted-activity cycle presentations. The results of the study indicated that teacher candidates are better able to implement those strategies into their teaching after this partnering of a metacognitive narrative with the overt modeling of these literacy strategies across grade level, content area, and ability level. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Reference

  • Pak, M., Knotts, G., & Gudoski, P. (2016). Cross-age, cross-content modeling: Improving teacher credential candidate skill at adapting and modifying. National Teacher Education Journal, 9(1). 17-24.

Journal

National Teacher Education Journal

Analysis

Is this article part of a larger project or series of studies?

no

Does this study draw on a large, preexisting data set?

no

Research Approach

  • programmatic research

Geographic Setting

  • southern California

Institutional Context

  • University based

Certification Level

  • Multiple levels of certification across programs

Programatic Focus

  • Elementary
  • Secondary
  • Special Education

Research Location Context

  • general coursework

Preservice Participants

  • undergraduate preservice teachers

Preservice Sample Size

87

Duration of Data Collection

  • Academic Semester

Data Sources

  • Observations
  • Survey

Data Analysis Tools

  • no analysis stated

Researcher Positionality

  • inside (staying their own students)

Research Questions

Will modeling "concrete, implementable literacy activities that spanned grade levels, content areas, and ability levels," "yield better candidate understanding of, and skill in, adapting and modifying classroom instruction?"
Is this research question explicit from the manuscript? Combination

Categories

1TEP Category: Teacher educator practices.

2PTP Category: Preservice teachers teaching practices (including shifts in teaching practices as a function of growth or context).

6GLP Category: Graduates literacy practices in classrooms

Comments

Subscribe
Notify of
Please login to comment
0 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted

© 2015–2026 The University of Texas at Austin
Supported by the Office of Instructional Innovation
Web Privacy Policy | Web Accessibility Policy | Contact

The University of Texas at Austin College of Education

The Literacy Research Association provided pilot funding for portions of this project.

wpDiscuz
0
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x
| Reply
wpDiscuz
0
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x
| Reply