CITE-ITEL A dialogical synthesis of research into initial literacy teacher preparation
Login

What Matters: Preparing Teachers of Reading

Abstract

A descriptive study was employed to determine differences in knowledge of literacy instruction and perceived preparedness to teach literacy between two groups of teacher candidates enrolled in two different teacher preparation programs at one university. This study investigated which components — coursework, field experience, and collaboration — candidates perceived as best preparing them to teach literacy while enrolled in their program. Data collection instruments included the Survey of Perceptions and the Knowledge Inventory. Both groups of candidates, regardless of program and amount of time in the field, viewed both coursework and field experience as important. Few significant differences were found between candidates in knowledge of literacy instruction. And, while they perceived themselves as prepared to teach literacy, candidates did identify areas of further instructional need.

Reference

  • Helfrich, S. R., & Bean, R. M. (2011). What matters: Preparing teachers of reading. Reading Horizons 50 (4), 241–62.

Journal

Reading Horizons

Analysis

Is this article part of a larger project or series of studies?

no

Does this study draw on a large, preexisting data set?

no

Research Approach

  • Descriptive study

Geographic Setting

  • Mid-Atlantic US

Institutional Context

  • University based

Certification Level

  • K-6

Programatic Focus

  • not stated

Research Location Context

  • Multiple contexts across programs

Preservice Participants

  • Post bachs (university based program)

Preservice Sample Size

103

Duration of Data Collection

  • Not clear

Data Sources

  • Knowledge Inventory (Florida Center for Reading Research)
  • Survey

Data Analysis Tools

  • Descriptive Analysis
  • Paired T-test

Researcher Positionality

  • not stated

Research Questions

"How do teacher candidates enrolled in two different preparation programs - a Master's of Arts in Teaching (MAT) program and a Professional Year (PY) program - perceive specific aspects of their program: coursework, field experience, and collaboration with others?" (p. 242)
Is this research question explicit from the manuscript? Yes
"How do teacher candidates enrolled in the MAT and PY programs perform on a test that measures knowledge of primary reading instruction?" (p. 242)
Is this research question explicit from the manuscript? Yes

Categories

2PTP Category: Preservice teachers teaching practices (including shifts in teaching practices as a function of growth or context).

3CCT Category: Course content -- Content of instruction (including TE's teaching with technology) and the experiences in the course that relate to this content.

4FIS Category: Field Experiences: inside schools

6GLP Category: Graduates literacy practices in classrooms

2PTI Category: Preservice teacher identity, knowledge, beliefs, attitudes, and/or orientation (ikbao) toward literacy or the teaching of literacy.

5SPP Category: Structure of preparation program.

4CTM Category: Cooperating/mentor teachers

4FUS Category: University facilitators/supervisors

Comments

Subscribe
Notify of
Please login to comment
0 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted

© 2015–2026 The University of Texas at Austin
Supported by the Office of Instructional Innovation
Web Privacy Policy | Web Accessibility Policy | Contact

The University of Texas at Austin College of Education

The Literacy Research Association provided pilot funding for portions of this project.

wpDiscuz
0
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x
| Reply
wpDiscuz
0
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x
| Reply