CITE-ITEL A dialogical synthesis of research into initial literacy teacher preparation
Login

Preservice literacy teaching: An opportunity to develop decision-making practices for quality instruction

Abstract

This descriptive case study explores how a preservice language arts methods course offers opportunities to develop and accelerate decision-making practices in reflection-based teaching. Jef, a teacher candidate, maximized learning opportunities for children during his eight-week literacy methods field experience. Decision-making processes were highlighted in course work and applied during teaching. Three key areas supported acceleration of literacy instruction, including decision-making, strategic use of mentor feedback, and reflection-based teaching. Findings reveal that Jef deliberately chose to use interplay of support to improve his literacy teaching. Implications suggest that acceleration in methods teaching may be accomplished when strong teacher candidate commitment to excellence is evident.

Reference

  • Wold, L. S., & Reitsma, J.  (2006).  Preservice Literacy Teaching: An Opportunity to Develop Decision-Making Practices for Quality Instruction.  Journal of Reading Education, 31(3), 11-20.

Journal

Journal of Reading Education

Analysis

Is this article part of a larger project or series of studies?

no

Does this study draw on a large, preexisting data set?

no

Research Approach

  • Case study
  • Qualitiative

Geographic Setting

  • midwest

Institutional Context

  • University based

Certification Level

  • Elementary

Programatic Focus

  • Elementary

Research Location Context

  • Elementary school

Preservice Participants

  • Undergraduates (university based program)

Preservice Sample Size

1

Other Participant Data

  • Cooperating teachers

Duration of Data Collection

  • Academic Semester

Data Sources

  • anecdotal observations of PTs in class
  • Cooperating Teacher Feedback
  • student reflections

Data Analysis Tools

  • Interactive analysis (Miles & Huberman, 1994)

Researcher Positionality

  • inside (staying their own students)

Research Questions

How do teacher candidates learn and accelerate the quality of language arts instruction through the complex interplay of decision-making and reflection-based practice?
Is this research question explicit from the manuscript? Yes

Categories

4CTM Category: Cooperating/mentor teachers

2PTP Category: Preservice teachers teaching practices (including shifts in teaching practices as a function of growth or context).

7OTH Topic: Other

7CHG Topic: Coaching

7REP Topic: Reflection and the reflective practitioner

7RES: Research

4FIS Category: Field Experiences: inside schools

3CCT Category: Course content -- Content of instruction (including TE's teaching with technology) and the experiences in the course that relate to this content.

3CCE Category: Course experiences – the work that is done in a course to promote the content.

Comments

Subscribe
Notify of
Please login to comment
0 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted

© 2015–2026 The University of Texas at Austin
Supported by the Office of Instructional Innovation
Web Privacy Policy | Web Accessibility Policy | Contact

The University of Texas at Austin College of Education

The Literacy Research Association provided pilot funding for portions of this project.

wpDiscuz
0
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x
| Reply
wpDiscuz
0
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x
| Reply