CITE-ITEL A dialogical synthesis of research into initial literacy teacher preparation
Login

Hope, happiness, and reciprocity: A thematic analysis of preservice teachers’ relationships with their reading buddies

Abstract

Tutoring is an important and effective means of helping young readers and writers who are experiencing difficulties. However, little is known about what kinds of relational qualities might accompany successful tutoring or how we might identify them. To address these issues, we analyzed the reflective writings of tutors in 10 tutor-student pairs classified as "very successful" or "less successful" by student achievement assessments. Results suggest that very successful tutoring pairs were deeply engaged in the human activity of caring and reciprocity. They also expressed a deep commitment by envisioning their students' futures in a hopeful manner and engaged in continual revision of their teaching. Less successful tutors had more conflicted relationships. Results suggest that helping tutors with strategy instruction and developing strong positive relationships with those they tutor may increase benefits for children.

Reference

  • Lysaker, J., McCormick, K., & Brunette, C. (2004). Hope, happiness, and reciprocity: A thematic analysis of preservice teachers' relationships with their reading buddies. Reading Research and Instruction, 44(2), 21-45. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19388070409558425

Journal

Reading Research and Instruction

Analysis

Is this article part of a larger project or series of studies?

no

Does this study draw on a large, preexisting data set?

no

Research Approach

  • Case study
  • Qualitiative

Geographic Setting

  • midwest

Institutional Context

  • University based

Certification Level

  • Elementary

Programatic Focus

  • Elementary

Research Location Context

  • Elementary school

Preservice Participants

  • undergraduate preservice teachers

Preservice Sample Size

15

Other Participant Data

  • Students in tutorial setting

Duration of Data Collection

  • Academic Semester

Data Sources

  • Observations
  • Reading growth
  • reflections

Data Analysis Tools

  • open coding and examined for emergent themes

Researcher Positionality

  • inside (staying their own students)

Research Questions

"Are there differences in how more successful and less successful tutors describe their tutoring experiences?" (p.4).
Is this research question explicit from the manuscript? Yes
"In what ways are relational qualities of tutoring pairs made visible by tutors?" (p.4).
Is this research question explicit from the manuscript? Yes
"What kinds of relational qualities can be identified in successful versus less successful tutoring pairs?" (p.4).
Is this research question explicit from the manuscript? Yes
"What are the implications for teacher education in identifying and valuing particular relational qualities for the education of teachers?" (p.4).
Is this research question explicit from the manuscript? Yes

Categories

4FIS Category: Field Experiences: inside schools

7REP Topic: Reflection and the reflective practitioner

7TUT Topic: Tutoring

7OTH Topic: Other

2PTP Category: Preservice teachers teaching practices (including shifts in teaching practices as a function of growth or context).

1TEI Category: Teacher educator identity, knowledge, beliefs, attitudes, and/or orientation (ikbao) to literacy or teacher preparation in literacy.

2PTI Category: Preservice teacher identity, knowledge, beliefs, attitudes, and/or orientation (ikbao) toward literacy or the teaching of literacy.

Comments

Subscribe
Notify of
Please login to comment
0 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted

© 2015–2026 The University of Texas at Austin
Supported by the Office of Instructional Innovation
Web Privacy Policy | Web Accessibility Policy | Contact

The University of Texas at Austin College of Education

The Literacy Research Association provided pilot funding for portions of this project.

wpDiscuz
0
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x
| Reply
wpDiscuz
0
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x
| Reply