CITE-ITEL A dialogical synthesis of research into initial literacy teacher preparation
Login

Preservice teacher understandings of adolescent literacy development: Naive wonder to dawning realization to intellectual rigor

Abstract

The authors document three stages of development their students progress through in the two integrated preservice courses they teach. In the first stage of “naive wonder,” the students exhibit enthusiasm for adolescent literacy development but provide only superficial, simplistic, and clichéd responses. At the stage of “dawning realization,” students begin to recognize the challenges involved and shift their focus from themselves as teachers to their students as learners. By the end of the two integrated courses, the students were in the third stage and approaching their responsibility for literacy development with intellectual rigor.

Reference

  • Freedman, L. & Carver, C. (2007). Preservice teacher understandings of adolescent literacy development: Naive wonder to dawning realization to intellectual rigor. Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy, 50(8), 654-665. 

Journal

Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy

Analysis

Is this article part of a larger project or series of studies?

yes

Does this study draw on a large, preexisting data set?

no

Research Approach

  • Action Research

Geographic Setting

  • not stated

Institutional Context

  • University based

Certification Level

  • Secondary

Programatic Focus

  • English
  • History
  • Literacy Education
  • Mathematics
  • Physics
  • Science

Research Location Context

  • Content area literacy course
  • General Methods Course

Preservice Participants

  • undergraduate preservice teachers

Preservice Sample Size

32

Duration of Data Collection

  • 2 summer semesters

Data Sources

  • written reflections/class papers

Data Analysis Tools

  • grounded theory
  • narrative analysis (Labov)

Researcher Positionality

  • inside (staying their own students)

Research Questions

What are students’ general understandings of teaching, students, and learning?
Is this research question explicit from the manuscript? Yes
How do our students’ understand literacy processes?
Is this research question explicit from the manuscript? Yes
How do our students under- stand their role in supporting secondary students’ literacy development?
Is this research question explicit from the manuscript? Yes
How do candidates come to understand their role as teachers of literacy?
Is this research question explicit from the manuscript? Yes

Categories

2PTI Category: Preservice teacher identity, knowledge, beliefs, attitudes, and/or orientation (ikbao) toward literacy or the teaching of literacy.

2PTP Category: Preservice teachers teaching practices (including shifts in teaching practices as a function of growth or context).

3CCE Category: Course experiences – the work that is done in a course to promote the content.

4FIS Category: Field Experiences: inside schools

7PTB Topic: Preservice teacher beliefs about students, families communities etc

7CDL Topic: Content area literacy

Comments

Subscribe
Notify of
Please login to comment
0 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted

© 2015–2026 The University of Texas at Austin
Supported by the Office of Instructional Innovation
Web Privacy Policy | Web Accessibility Policy | Contact

The University of Texas at Austin College of Education

The Literacy Research Association provided pilot funding for portions of this project.

wpDiscuz
0
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x
| Reply
wpDiscuz
0
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x
| Reply