CITE-ITEL A dialogical synthesis of research into initial literacy teacher preparation
Login

Writing Instruction for Teacher Candidates: Strengthening a Weak Curricular Area

Abstract

In this case study, two teacher educators in literacy examined teacher candidates' (N = 24) learning of writing instruction across a three-course sequence of literacy methods. Data collected included a survey of candidates' knowledge of writing instruction, their formal observations of writing lessons in their student-teaching placements, a writing lesson co-constructed with a cooperating teacher during their final student-teaching placement, and structured reflections on the observations and lessons. The researchers found that little writing instruction occurred in the schools where teacher candidates were placed and that reading and reading skills dominated observed literacy instruction. Teacher candidates valued particular elements of process writing (focus on student needs, choice, scaffolding, student interest and engagement, and literacy skills). Lesson plans and reflections toward the end of the academic sequence demonstrated that teacher candidates' knowledge about writing instruction increased in complexity and that their beliefs and their practices were somewhat aligned. Implications for teacher education programs include a need to provide scaffolded and distributed instruction for new teachers in the area of writing instruction.
 

Reference

  • Grisham, D. L., & Wolsey, T. D. (2011). Writing instruction for teacher candidates: Strengthening a weak curricular area. Literacy Research and Instruction, 50(4), 348-364.

Journal

Literacy Research and Instruction

Analysis

Is this article part of a larger project or series of studies?

no

Does this study draw on a large, preexisting data set?

no

Research Approach

  • Case study
  • Qualitiative
  • Quantitative
  • Survey

Geographic Setting

  • California

Institutional Context

  • University based

Certification Level

  • Elementary

Programatic Focus

  • Literacy Education

Research Location Context

  • Literacy methods course

Preservice Participants

  • Five-year program

Preservice Sample Size

24

Duration of Data Collection

  • 2 academic semesters

Data Sources

  • End-of-course evaluations
  • lesson plans
  • Observations
  • reflections
  • Survey

Data Analysis Tools

  • Constant comparative analysis

Researcher Positionality

  • inside (staying their own students)

Research Questions

What Elements of Writing Instruction do Teacher Candidates Value?
Is this research question explicit from the manuscript? Yes
What Elements of Writing Instruction do Teacher Candidates Use in Their Lessons in Field Placements?
Is this research question explicit from the manuscript? Yes
What Effect Does Direct Teaching of Writing Instruction in a Literacy Methods Course Have on Teacher Candidates’ Knowledge of Writing Instruction and Their Self-Efficacy in Teaching Writing?
Is this research question explicit from the manuscript? Yes

Categories

2PTI Category: Preservice teacher identity, knowledge, beliefs, attitudes, and/or orientation (ikbao) toward literacy or the teaching of literacy.

2PTL Category: Preservice teachers own literacy (experiences and practices).

2PTP Category: Preservice teachers teaching practices (including shifts in teaching practices as a function of growth or context).

3CCE Category: Course experiences – the work that is done in a course to promote the content.

4FIS Category: Field Experiences: inside schools

7REP Topic: Reflection and the reflective practitioner

7WTG Topic: Writing

7PTB Topic: Preservice teacher beliefs about students, families communities etc

6GLP Category: Graduates literacy practices in classrooms

Comments

Subscribe
Notify of
Please login to comment
0 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted

© 2015–2026 The University of Texas at Austin
Supported by the Office of Instructional Innovation
Web Privacy Policy | Web Accessibility Policy | Contact

The University of Texas at Austin College of Education

The Literacy Research Association provided pilot funding for portions of this project.

wpDiscuz
0
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x
| Reply
wpDiscuz
0
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x
| Reply