CITE-ITEL A dialogical synthesis of research into initial literacy teacher preparation
Login

“White People Don’t Work at McDonald’s” and Other Shadow Stories from the Field: Analyzing preservice teachers’ use of Obama’s race speech to teach for social justice

Abstract

This study investigates the outcomes of two novice preservice teachers’ (PSTs’) attempts at taking up the roles of critical guides (Damico & Apol, 2008) to mediate discussions about racism inresponse to President Barack Obama’s (2008) campaign speech “A More Perfect Union.” With the objective of teaching for social justice, these PSTs initiated their discussions in two senior English classrooms at the same high school located in a predominantly white, economically low-middle-class Midwest community. Profiles of each intern were developed from data comprised of field notes, meeting notes, interviews, video and audio recordings, journal entries, essays, and other artifacts. Framed by Damico and Apol’s (2008) concept for mediating historical risky texts, and grounded in the principles of critical literacy and antiracist pedagogy, this investigation demonstrates that despite their objective to teach social justice, the PSTs enacted discussions that generated shadow texts (Simon, 2000) and perpetuated stereotypes. It suggests that for these PSTs, there may be a disconnection between the theories they learned in their teacher preparation courses and their practical application of such theories in the field.

Reference

  • Davila, D. (2011). "White People Don't Work at McDonald's" and Other Shadow Stories from the Field: Analyzing Preservice Teachers' Use of Obama's Race Speech to Teach for Social Justice. English Education, 44(1), 13-50.

Journal

English Education

Analysis

Is this article part of a larger project or series of studies?

no

Does this study draw on a large, preexisting data set?

no

Research Approach

  • Qualitiative

Geographic Setting

  • not stated

Institutional Context

  • University based

Certification Level

  • Secondary

Programatic Focus

  • English

Research Location Context

  • field-based methods course

Preservice Participants

  • Undergraduates (university based program)

Preservice Sample Size

2

Duration of Data Collection

  • Academic Semester

Data Sources

  • artifacts
  • Classroom Discussion
  • fieldnotes
  • Interviews
  • journal entries
  • Observation of PT lessons
  • reflections
  • Transcriptions
  • Video

Data Analysis Tools

  • classroom discourse analysis
  • Simon and Armitage Simon's (1995) psychoanalytic lens

Researcher Positionality

  • inside (staying their own students)

Research Questions

How do preservice teachers take up the role of "critical guide" as novice teachers?
Is this research question explicit from the manuscript? No
How can student comments be a source of illumination in challenging, confronting, and disrupting shadow stories and critically examining racism?
Is this research question explicit from the manuscript? Combination
What are the gaps that exist between the theories preservice teachers learn in their teacher education programs and their practices in the classroom?
Is this research question explicit from the manuscript? No

Categories

2PTI Category: Preservice teacher identity, knowledge, beliefs, attitudes, and/or orientation (ikbao) toward literacy or the teaching of literacy.

2PTL Category: Preservice teachers own literacy (experiences and practices).

3CCE Category: Course experiences – the work that is done in a course to promote the content.

7TSJ Topic: Teaching for social justice

7SIU Topic: Sociocultural Influences and Understandings

2PTP Category: Preservice teachers teaching practices (including shifts in teaching practices as a function of growth or context).

Comments

Subscribe
Notify of
Please login to comment
0 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted

© 2015–2026 The University of Texas at Austin
Supported by the Office of Instructional Innovation
Web Privacy Policy | Web Accessibility Policy | Contact

The University of Texas at Austin College of Education

The Literacy Research Association provided pilot funding for portions of this project.

wpDiscuz
0
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x
| Reply
wpDiscuz
0
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x
| Reply