CITE-ITEL A dialogical synthesis of research into initial literacy teacher preparation
Login

Tensions between traditions: The role of contexts in learning to teach

Abstract

In this study we look at one teacher, Jimmy Ladd, and his early-career efforts to develop an approach to teaching within competing traditions. We pay particular attention to the contexts in which he learned to teach—his university program, his site of student teaching, and his first job—to understand the ways in which they suggested or impressed particular traditions on the teachers within them. Our inquiry is driven by the following questions: 1. In the major settings of Jimmy’s learning to teach, what conceptions of teaching and learning were available? How did the goals, structures, What teaching traditions were evident in Jimmy’s teaching? Towhat extent did his instructional practice exhibit consistency of a teaching conception? In essence, our study of Jimmy’s teaching situates teacher education programs in the context of the old breadth vs. depth discussion about learning to teach: Which is preferable, broad coverage of all possibilities or a more limited and concerted study of fewer approaches, particularly across time and settings? Each has different consequences: a more inclusive tool kit in one case, a more unified tool kit in the other and processes of activity in those settings affect Jimmy’s development of an approach to teaching?

Reference

  • Bickmore, S. T., Smagorinsky, P., & O'Donnell-Allen, C. (2005). Tensions between traditions: The role of contexts in learning to teach. English Education, 38(1), 23-52.

Journal

English Education

Analysis

Is this article part of a larger project or series of studies?

no

Does this study draw on a large, preexisting data set?

no

Research Approach

  • Case study
  • Qualitiative

Geographic Setting

  • not stated

Institutional Context

  • University based

Certification Level

  • Middle
  • Secondary

Programatic Focus

  • English

Research Location Context

  • Multi-sited (high schools)
  • University

Preservice Participants

  • Masters

Preservice Sample Size

1

Duration of Data Collection

  • Not clear

Data Sources

  • Experiences across time of a preservice teacher who becomes an inservice teacher
  • Interviews

Data Analysis Tools

  • no analysis stated

Researcher Positionality

  • Outside (not directly invested in the program or operations)

Research Questions

In the major settings of Jimmy’s learning to teach, what conceptions of teaching and learning were available? How did the goals, structures, and processes of activity in those settings affect Jimmy’s development of an approach to teaching?
Is this research question explicit from the manuscript? Yes
What teaching traditions were evident in Jimmy’s teaching? To what extent did his instructional practice exhibit consistency of a teaching conception?
Is this research question explicit from the manuscript? Yes

Categories

2PTI Category: Preservice teacher identity, knowledge, beliefs, attitudes, and/or orientation (ikbao) toward literacy or the teaching of literacy.

2PTP Category: Preservice teachers teaching practices (including shifts in teaching practices as a function of growth or context).

4CTM Category: Cooperating/mentor teachers

4FIS Category: Field Experiences: inside schools

5SPP Category: Structure of preparation program.

6GCP Category: Graduates career paths

7SEC Topic: English (Secondary)

7TRN Topic: Transitions

6GLP Category: Graduates literacy practices in classrooms

Comments

Subscribe
Notify of
Please login to comment
0 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted

© 2015–2026 The University of Texas at Austin
Supported by the Office of Instructional Innovation
Web Privacy Policy | Web Accessibility Policy | Contact

The University of Texas at Austin College of Education

The Literacy Research Association provided pilot funding for portions of this project.

wpDiscuz
0
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x
| Reply
wpDiscuz
0
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x
| Reply