CITE-ITEL A dialogical synthesis of research into initial literacy teacher preparation
Login

Teachers’ acquisition of knowledge about English word structure

Abstract

Previous research suggests that teachers’ knowledge about English word structure (e.g., the phonological structure of words and common orthographic patterns in English) may be limited, although this knowledge is important for effective teaching of word decoding. This study examined teacher education students’ knowledge about word structure, and improvements in their knowledge as a result of instruction, using three tasks: graphophonemic segmentation, classification of pseudowords by syllable type, and classification of real words as phonetically regular or irregular. Participants came from a special education certification program and included both preservice and inservice teachers. Results indicated that prior preparation to teach reading influenced participants’ initial performance on two of the three word-structure tasks (all but graphophonemic segmentation); however, prior experience in teaching reading did not influence word-structure knowledge. A subset of participants who received specific instruction about word structure improved their knowledge relative to a comparison group of teacher education students who did not receive word-structure instruction. Prior preparation did not influence participants’ responsiveness to instruction. Conclusions support the viewpoint that teacher education must include information about English word structure for educators who will teach reading and suggest that sufficiently intensive instruction may be important in developing word-structure knowledge.

Reference

  • Spear-Swerling, L., & Brucker, P. O. (2003). Teachers’ acquisition of knowledge about English word structure. Annals of Dyslexia, 53, 72-103.

Journal

Annals of Dyslexia

Analysis

Is this article part of a larger project or series of studies?

yes

Does this study draw on a large, preexisting data set?

no

Research Approach

  • Experimental
  • Positivist/Post Positivist (quantitative)
  • Quantitative

Geographic Setting

  • United States

Institutional Context

  • University based

Certification Level

  • Special Education

Programatic Focus

  • Special Education

Research Location Context

  • University

Preservice Participants

  • Masters
  • Undergraduates (university based program)

Preservice Sample Size

147

Other Participant Data

  • Inservice Teachers

Duration of Data Collection

  • Academic Semester

Data Sources

  • post-test
  • pre-/post-assessment

Data Analysis Tools

  • ANOVA
  • Correlation
  • MANOVA
  • Multivariate, multilevel, cross-classification logit model
  • Pearson product-moment correlation analysis
  • Statistical analysis

Researcher Positionality

  • not stated

Research Questions

Do individual differences in teacher-education students' component reading abilities relate to their knowledge about word structure?
Is this research question explicit from the manuscript? Yes
If so, does the pattern of relationships vary by component reading ability or by word-structure task?
Is this research question explicit from the manuscript? Yes
To what extent do component reading abilities influence students' acquisition of word-structure knowledge after course instruction?
Is this research question explicit from the manuscript? Yes

Categories

2PTL Category: Preservice teachers own literacy (experiences and practices).

3CCT Category: Course content -- Content of instruction (including TE's teaching with technology) and the experiences in the course that relate to this content.

7RPR Topic: Reading processes (eg, vocabulary)

Comments

Subscribe
Notify of
Please login to comment
0 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted

© 2015–2026 The University of Texas at Austin
Supported by the Office of Instructional Innovation
Web Privacy Policy | Web Accessibility Policy | Contact

The University of Texas at Austin College of Education

The Literacy Research Association provided pilot funding for portions of this project.

wpDiscuz
0
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x
| Reply
wpDiscuz
0
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x
| Reply