CITE-ITEL A dialogical synthesis of research into initial literacy teacher preparation
Login

Swimming in shallow waters promoting deep comprehension through strategy instruction.

Abstract

This study investigated whether a semester of instruction that emphasized the processes used to strengthen comprehension, while simultaneously teaching structures to assist in teaching those same processes, would improve the comprehension abilities and ultimately the teaching effectiveness of preservice teachers. Formative assessment results indicated pre-service students lacked the ability to answer higher-level comprehension questions and knowledge of the strategies good readers use to improve comprehension. Summative results concluded that pre-service teachers participating in the study improved their ability to respond thoughtfully to texts and clarified their understanding of what effective readers do to enable deep comprehension.

Reference

  • Modla, V., McGeehan, C., & Lewinski, K. (2014). Swimming in Shallow Waters Promoting Deep Comprehension through Strategy Instruction. Journal Of Reading Education, 39(3), 22-28.

Journal

Journal of Reading Education

Analysis

Is this article part of a larger project or series of studies?

no

Does this study draw on a large, preexisting data set?

no

Research Approach

  • Pre-test, Intervention, Post-test

Geographic Setting

  • not stated

Institutional Context

  • not stated

Certification Level

  • Elementary

Programatic Focus

  • Elementary
  • Special Education

Research Location Context

  • University

Preservice Participants

  • Undergraduates (university based program)

Preservice Sample Size

78

Duration of Data Collection

  • 2 years

Data Sources

  • pre- and post-questionnaires
  • pre-/post-assessment

Data Analysis Tools

  • Paired T-test

Researcher Positionality

  • not stated

Research Questions

Do teacher candidates tend to respond thoughtfully to text?
Is this research question explicit from the manuscript? Yes
Does learning about the structures of narrative and expository text in conjunction with other comprehension skills and strategies improve the comprehension abilities of teacher candidates?
Is this research question explicit from the manuscript? Yes
3) Do teacher candidates recognize a reasonable range of metacognitive strategies that skilled readers are expected to use in their own comprehension?
Is this research question explicit from the manuscript? Yes
4) Does learning about metacognitive strategies and how to teach them improve their knowledge of what skilled readers do before, during, and after reading to monitor their understanding?
Is this research question explicit from the manuscript? Yes

Categories

1TEI Category: Teacher educator identity, knowledge, beliefs, attitudes, and/or orientation (ikbao) to literacy or teacher preparation in literacy.

2PTI Category: Preservice teacher identity, knowledge, beliefs, attitudes, and/or orientation (ikbao) toward literacy or the teaching of literacy.

2PTL Category: Preservice teachers own literacy (experiences and practices).

3CCE Category: Course experiences – the work that is done in a course to promote the content.

6GLP Category: Graduates literacy practices in classrooms

6GPM Category: Graduates performance on measures of teacher learning and growth.

7CDL Topic: Content area literacy

7RPR Topic: Reading processes (eg, vocabulary)

3CCT Category: Course content -- Content of instruction (including TE's teaching with technology) and the experiences in the course that relate to this content.

Comments

Subscribe
Notify of
Please login to comment
0 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted

© 2015–2026 The University of Texas at Austin
Supported by the Office of Instructional Innovation
Web Privacy Policy | Web Accessibility Policy | Contact

The University of Texas at Austin College of Education

The Literacy Research Association provided pilot funding for portions of this project.

wpDiscuz
0
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x
| Reply
wpDiscuz
0
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x
| Reply