CITE-ITEL A dialogical synthesis of research into initial literacy teacher preparation
Login

Putting professionalism back into teaching: Secondary preservice and in-service teachers engaging in interdisciplinary unit planning

Abstract

Recently, interdisciplinary instruction has come back to the educational scene, specifically supported through the Common Core State Standards. As teacher educators and former middle-level teachers, the authors see this as a positive move to enhance learning for adolescents. This qualitative study sought to answer: How do secondary preservice and in-service teachers respond to interdisciplinary instruction? Findings provide key insights into how interdisciplinary instruction, when implemented successfully within a content area literacy course, empowers preservice and in-service teachers, and brings about a more professional environment. That is, data shows designing interdisciplinary instruction provided the teachers space to take up an identity as teaching professional—acting as specialist, acting as agent, and acting as regulator. Based on the authors’ analysis, the authors believe interdisciplinary instruction has the potential to elevate the professional status for teachers, and teacher educators can lead and guide secondary preservice and in-service teachers toward new understandings and paradigms surrounding interdisciplinary methods as we seek to evolve and improve secondary-level curriculum.

Reference

  • Stolle, E. P. & Frambaugh-Kritzer, C. (2014). Putting professionalism back into teaching: Secondary preservice and in-service teachers engaging in interdisciplinary unit planning. Action in Teacher Education, 36(1), 61-75. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01626620.2013.850123

Journal

Action in Teacher Education

Analysis

Is this article part of a larger project or series of studies?

no

Does this study draw on a large, preexisting data set?

no

Research Approach

  • Qualitiative

Geographic Setting

  • midwest
  • Southwestern United States

Institutional Context

  • University based

Certification Level

  • Secondary

Programatic Focus

  • Literacy Education

Research Location Context

  • University

Preservice Participants

  • Undergraduates (university based program)

Preservice Sample Size

45

Duration of Data Collection

  • Academic Semester

Data Sources

  • course materials
  • email correspondence
  • Observations
  • Reflective journals
  • Survey

Data Analysis Tools

  • coding (open to axial to selective
  • Qualitative Analysis

Researcher Positionality

  • inside (staying their own students)

Research Questions

How do preservice and in-service secondary teachers respond to interdisciplinary instruction?
Is this research question explicit from the manuscript? Yes

Categories

3CCT Category: Course content -- Content of instruction (including TE's teaching with technology) and the experiences in the course that relate to this content.

7CDL Topic: Content area literacy

8A Topic: Findings in Need of a Category

2PTI Category: Preservice teacher identity, knowledge, beliefs, attitudes, and/or orientation (ikbao) toward literacy or the teaching of literacy.

1TEI Category: Teacher educator identity, knowledge, beliefs, attitudes, and/or orientation (ikbao) to literacy or teacher preparation in literacy.

2PTP Category: Preservice teachers teaching practices (including shifts in teaching practices as a function of growth or context).

1TES Category: Teacher educator practices focused on surrounding external/political pressures.

Comments

Subscribe
Notify of
Please login to comment
0 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted

© 2015–2026 The University of Texas at Austin
Supported by the Office of Instructional Innovation
Web Privacy Policy | Web Accessibility Policy | Contact

The University of Texas at Austin College of Education

The Literacy Research Association provided pilot funding for portions of this project.

wpDiscuz
0
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x
| Reply
wpDiscuz
0
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x
| Reply