CITE-ITEL A dialogical synthesis of research into initial literacy teacher preparation
Login

Preservice tutors and first-grade students: Instruction, interactions, and faculty feedback

Abstract

This study describes the tutoring interactions of four early childhood preservice tutors, two able and two less able, to document the tutoring strategies they applied as they provided support for their first-grade student at point of need. The two more able tutors provided various prompts to foster their students' use of strategies, thus demonstrating their ability to skillfully apply course learning to their work with children. The two less able tutors were unable to balance prompting, as they focused more heavily on correct word reading and appeared to have a limited understanding of how to support growth through reading. In addition, the instructor's online feedback was investigated and four categories identified: confirming, suggesting, directing, and teaching. The more able tutors used this feedback to fine-tune their tutoring sessions. Online feedback was not sufficient for helping the less able tutors develop a more strategic teaching stance. The findings suggest important implications for strengthening preservice literacy coursework and for scaffolding preservice tutors.

Reference

  • Timmons, B. J., & Morgan, D. N. (2010). Preservice tutors and first-grade students: Instruction, interactions, and faculty feedback. Literacy Research and Instruction, 50, 15-30. doi: 10.1080/19388070903402118

Journal

Literacy Research and Instruction

Analysis

Is this article part of a larger project or series of studies?

no

Does this study draw on a large, preexisting data set?

no

Research Approach

  • Qualitiative

Geographic Setting

  • not stated

Institutional Context

  • not stated

Certification Level

  • early childhood

Programatic Focus

  • early childhood education

Research Location Context

  • Beginning literacy instruction course

Preservice Participants

  • Not stated

Preservice Sample Size

4

Other Participant Data

  • Teacher Educators

Duration of Data Collection

  • 8 30-minute sessions

Data Sources

  • instructor feedback
  • Observations
  • Tutoring plans
  • weekly logs

Data Analysis Tools

  • Constant comparative analysis

Researcher Positionality

  • not stated

Research Questions

How did the preservice teachers attempt to support students’ literacy development during their tutoring sessions?
Is this research question explicit from the manuscript? Yes
What did we notice about how preservice teachers interacted when their student experienced reading difficulty?
Is this research question explicit from the manuscript? Yes
What was the nature of the instructor’s weekly written feedback to the preservice teachers?
Is this research question explicit from the manuscript? Yes

Categories

2PTP Category: Preservice teachers teaching practices (including shifts in teaching practices as a function of growth or context).

4FIS Category: Field Experiences: inside schools

7TUT Topic: Tutoring

7RPR Topic: Reading processes (eg, vocabulary)

7ASS Topic: Assessment

1TEP Category: Teacher educator practices.

7CHG Topic: Coaching

Comments

Subscribe
Notify of
Please login to comment
0 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted

© 2015–2026 The University of Texas at Austin
Supported by the Office of Instructional Innovation
Web Privacy Policy | Web Accessibility Policy | Contact

The University of Texas at Austin College of Education

The Literacy Research Association provided pilot funding for portions of this project.

wpDiscuz
0
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x
| Reply
wpDiscuz
0
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x
| Reply