Preservice teachers’ use of action research to implement alternatives to round robin reading
Abstract
This article describes two preservice teachers’ use of action research to examine their beliefs and practices regarding oral reading in the classroom. These teachers revisited in depth the research-based practices taught in their reading methods courses and selectively and thoughtfully implemented alternatives to round robin reading (RRR) in their elementary and special education student teaching placements. During their first year of teaching, they succumbed to the multiple demands of the classroom, reverting to RRR on occasion; however, both are committed to replacing this potentially harmful exercise with more effective oral reading practices.
Reference
Monroe, E. E., Gali, K., Swope, K., & Perreira, I. (2007). Preservice teachers' use of action research to implement alternatives to Round Robin Reading. Journal of Reading Education, 32(2), 13-17.
Journal
Journal of Reading Education
Analysis
Is this article part of a larger project or series of studies?
no
Does this study draw on a large, preexisting data set?
no
Research Approach
Geographic Setting
Institutional Context
Certification Level
- Elementary
- Secondary
- Special Education
Programatic Focus
- Elementary
- Special Education
Research Location Context
- field placements (not related to methods courses)
Preservice Participants
- Undergraduates (university based program)
Preservice Sample Size
Duration of Data Collection
Data Sources
- Interviews
- lesson plans
- Reflective journals
Data Analysis Tools
Researcher Positionality
- inside (staying their own students)
Research Questions
The purpose of this project was to support these student teachers as they learned about research-based oral reading strategies and implemented them in their cooperating classrooms.
Is this research question explicit from the manuscript? Yes
The purpose of this project was to study how they changed their teaching through becoming researchers themselves.
Is this research question explicit from the manuscript? Yes