CITE-ITEL A dialogical synthesis of research into initial literacy teacher preparation
Login

Preparing preservice teachers to implement class wide peer tutoring

Abstract

This study focused on preservice general education teachers who were prepared to use an evidence-based teaching practice and the effects the practice had on their pupils' academic performance. Participants learned to use Juniper Gardens Children's Project's Class Wide Peer Tutoring (CWPT) program through a two-hour workshop and with in class assistance. The amount of time required for each preservice teacher to reach a pre-established training criterion (i.e., unassisted use of CWPT for three consecutive sessions with fidelity ratings of 85% and above) was calculated and specific implementation comments and concerns were recorded. Academic effects on pupils' spelling test performance were assessed using weekly pretests and posttests and social validity data were collected from all primary consumers. Key outcomes were that (a) preservice teachers were able implement CWPT with a high degree of accuracy with about 60 minutes of in class assistance, (b) use of CWPT resulted in high spelling grades on weekly posttests for all pupils, (c) preservice and cooperating teachers and their pupils reported favorable “treatment acceptability” for CWPT, and (d) some preservice teachers made procedural adaptations that appeared to be related to lower levels of pupil satisfaction. Findings are discussed in light of recent movements in the use of evidence-based teaching practices, professional accountability, and preservice teacher preparation.

Reference

  • Maheady, L., Harper, G. F., Mallette, B., & Karnes, M. (2004). Preparing preservice teachers to implement class wide peer tutoring. Teacher Education and Special Education, 27(4), 408-418. doi:10.1177/088840640402700408

     

     

Journal

Teacher Education and Special Education

Analysis

Is this article part of a larger project or series of studies?

no

Does this study draw on a large, preexisting data set?

no

Research Approach

  • Experimental

Geographic Setting

  • Western New York

Institutional Context

  • not stated

Certification Level

  • Generalist

Programatic Focus

  • not stated

Research Location Context

  • Elementary school

Preservice Participants

  • Undergraduates (university based program)

Preservice Sample Size

10

Other Participant Data

  • Cooperating teachers
  • Students in classrooms

Duration of Data Collection

Data Sources

  • Peer Tutoring Evaluation Inventory
  • pre-/post-assessment
  • Survey

Data Analysis Tools

  • Descriptive Analysis

Researcher Positionality

  • inside (staying their own students)
  • Inside (studying their own practices)

Research Questions

"To what extent can we document a procedure for preparing preservice general educators to use CWPT in an accurate and durable manner?" (p. 409)
Is this research question explicit from the manuscript? Yes
To what extent does preservice educators’ use of CWPT effect pupils’ weekly spelling test performance?" (p. 409).
Is this research question explicit from the manuscript? Yes
"To what extent are CWPT goals, procedures, and outcomes socially acceptable for primary consumers (e.g., pupils, preservice, and cooperating teachers)?" (p. 409)
Is this research question explicit from the manuscript? Yes

Categories

2PTI Category: Preservice teacher identity, knowledge, beliefs, attitudes, and/or orientation (ikbao) toward literacy or the teaching of literacy.

1TEP Category: Teacher educator practices.

2PTP Category: Preservice teachers teaching practices (including shifts in teaching practices as a function of growth or context).

Comments

Subscribe
Notify of
Please login to comment
0 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted

© 2015–2026 The University of Texas at Austin
Supported by the Office of Instructional Innovation
Web Privacy Policy | Web Accessibility Policy | Contact

The University of Texas at Austin College of Education

The Literacy Research Association provided pilot funding for portions of this project.

wpDiscuz
0
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x
| Reply
wpDiscuz
0
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x
| Reply