CITE-ITEL A dialogical synthesis of research into initial literacy teacher preparation
Login

Preparing beginning reading teachers: an experimental comparison of initial early literacy field experiences.

Abstract

This randomized-control trial examined the learning of preservice teachers taking an initial Early Literacy course in an early childhood education program and of the kindergarten or first grade students they tutored in their field experience. Preservice teachers were randomly assigned to one of two tutoring programs: Book Buddies and Tutor Assisted Intensive Learning Strategies (TAILS), which provided identical meaning-focused instruction (shared book reading), but differed in the presentation of code-focused skills. TAILS used explicit, scripted lessons, and the Book Buddies required that code-focused instruction take place during shared book reading. Our research goal was to understand which tutoring program would be most effective in improving knowledge about reading, lead to broad and deep language and preparedness of the novice preservice teachers, and yield the most successful student reading outcomes. Findings indicate that all preservice teachers demonstrated similar gains in knowledge, but preservice teachers in the TAILS program demonstrated broader and deeper application of knowledge and higher self-ratings of preparedness to teach reading. Students in both conditions made similar comprehension gains, but students tutored with TAILS showed significantly stronger decoding gains.

Reference

  • Al Otaiba, S., Lake, V. E., Greulich, L., Folsom, J. S., & Guidry, L. (2012). Preparing beginning reading teachers: an experimental comparison of initial early literacy field experiences. Reading and Writing, 25(1), 109–129.

Journal

Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal

Analysis

Is this article part of a larger project or series of studies?

unclear

Does this study draw on a large, preexisting data set?

no

Research Approach

  • mixed methods
  • randomized-control trial

Geographic Setting

  • Southeast of the United States

Institutional Context

  • University based

Certification Level

  • early childhood
  • PreK-3

Programatic Focus

  • early childhood education

Research Location Context

  • General Methods Course
  • University

Preservice Participants

  • Undergraduates (university based program)

Preservice Sample Size

28

Other Participant Data

  • Students in tutorial setting

Duration of Data Collection

  • Academic Semester

Data Sources

  • lesson plans
  • Standardized Assessments
  • student self-evaluations
  • Teacher Knowledge Assessment- Structure of Language (Mather, Bos & Babur, 2001)

Data Analysis Tools

  • ANOVA
  • coding (non-specific)

Researcher Positionality

  • inside (staying their own students)

Research Questions

Which of two tutoring programs, "would be most effective in improving knowledge about reading and lead to broad and deep language and preparedness of the novice preservice teachers"?
Is this research question explicit from the manuscript? Combination
Which of two tutoring programs would, "yield the most successful student reading outcomes?"
Is this research question explicit from the manuscript? Combination

Categories

2PTI Category: Preservice teacher identity, knowledge, beliefs, attitudes, and/or orientation (ikbao) toward literacy or the teaching of literacy.

3CCE Category: Course experiences – the work that is done in a course to promote the content.

4FIS Category: Field Experiences: inside schools

6GIL Category: Graduates impact on students’ literacy.

7TUT Topic: Tutoring

6GPM Category: Graduates performance on measures of teacher learning and growth.

Comments

Subscribe
Notify of
Please login to comment
0 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted

© 2015–2026 The University of Texas at Austin
Supported by the Office of Instructional Innovation
Web Privacy Policy | Web Accessibility Policy | Contact

The University of Texas at Austin College of Education

The Literacy Research Association provided pilot funding for portions of this project.

wpDiscuz
0
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x
| Reply
wpDiscuz
0
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x
| Reply