CITE-ITEL A dialogical synthesis of research into initial literacy teacher preparation
Login

Personal Journeys: Teaching Teachers to Teach Literacy

Abstract

This study is a description of a teacher research project. The purpose of the project was two-fold. First, I wanted to use it to help me carefully reflect and examine my own teaching, so that I could move past the "naïve" label. Second, I wanted to understand how my instruction impacted my preservice teachers. Results from this teacher research project suggest this reading methods course was effective in adding some strategies to the students' understandings of reading. Students seemed more willing to add reading strategies in areas where they lacked prior knowledge and experiences, such as fluency and assessment, while demonstrating more reluctance to change in areas familiar to them, such as word identification and comprehension. Results imply a need for educators to do more teacher research at the university level and further research into the role prior knowledge plays in the preservice teachers' willingness to adapt new instructional strategies.

Reference

  • Massey, D. (2002). Personal journeys: Teaching teachers to teach literacy. Reading Research and Instruction, 41(2), 103-125. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19388070209558361

Journal

Reading Research and Instruction

Analysis

Is this article part of a larger project or series of studies?

no

Does this study draw on a large, preexisting data set?

no

Research Approach

  • teacher research

Geographic Setting

  • United States

Institutional Context

  • University based

Certification Level

  • Not stated

Programatic Focus

  • not stated

Research Location Context

  • Literacy methods course

Preservice Participants

  • Undergraduates (university based program)

Preservice Sample Size

20

Other Participant Data

  • curriculum documents and planning books
  • Teacher Educators

Duration of Data Collection

  • Academic Semester

Data Sources

  • Classroom Discussion
  • course materials
  • End-of-course evaluations
  • fieldnotes
  • lesson plans
  • Reflective journals
  • Researcher journals

Data Analysis Tools

  • coding to a prior categories
  • Constant comparative analysis
  • Document analysis
  • Triangulation

Researcher Positionality

  • Inside (studying their own practices)

Research Questions

"First, I wanted to use it to help me carefully reflect and examine my own teaching, so that I could move past the "naive" label." (p. 104)
Is this research question explicit from the manuscript? Yes
"Second, I wanted to understand how my instruction impacted my preservice teachers." (p. 104)
Is this research question explicit from the manuscript? Yes

Categories

2PTI Category: Preservice teacher identity, knowledge, beliefs, attitudes, and/or orientation (ikbao) toward literacy or the teaching of literacy.

3CCT Category: Course content -- Content of instruction (including TE's teaching with technology) and the experiences in the course that relate to this content.

6GLP Category: Graduates literacy practices in classrooms

7PTB Topic: Preservice teacher beliefs about students, families communities etc

3CCE Category: Course experiences – the work that is done in a course to promote the content.

7RPR Topic: Reading processes (eg, vocabulary)

1TEI Category: Teacher educator identity, knowledge, beliefs, attitudes, and/or orientation (ikbao) to literacy or teacher preparation in literacy.

6GIL Category: Graduates impact on students’ literacy.

7RES: Research

1TEP Category: Teacher educator practices.

Comments

Subscribe
Notify of
Please login to comment
0 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted

© 2015–2026 The University of Texas at Austin
Supported by the Office of Instructional Innovation
Web Privacy Policy | Web Accessibility Policy | Contact

The University of Texas at Austin College of Education

The Literacy Research Association provided pilot funding for portions of this project.

wpDiscuz
0
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x
| Reply
wpDiscuz
0
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x
| Reply