CITE-ITEL A dialogical synthesis of research into initial literacy teacher preparation
Login

Partners in professionalism: creating a quality field experience for preservice teachers

Abstract

A study examined preservice elementary teachers' field experience within a professional development school (PDS). Primary participants were five preservice teachers who took part in a university/schools PDS project in Washington. Results suggested that the eight aspects of the field experience that had a profound effect on the participants were a yearlong experience, clustering within the PDS, on-site literacy classes, teacher study groups and action research, a steering committee, enhanced supervision, a second PDS field experience, and participants' improved status.; (AN 507740527)

Reference

  • Grisham, D. L., Laguardia, A., & Brink, B. (2000). Partners in professionalism: Creating a quality field experience for preservice teachers. Action in Teacher Education, 21(4), 27-40.

Journal

Action in Teacher Education

Analysis

Is this article part of a larger project or series of studies?

no

Does this study draw on a large, preexisting data set?

no

Research Approach

  • Qualitiative

Geographic Setting

  • Washington State

Institutional Context

  • University based

Certification Level

  • K- 8

Programatic Focus

  • Elementary

Research Location Context

  • Professional Development School (PDS)

Preservice Participants

  • Graduate Students
  • Master in teaching (MIT)

Preservice Sample Size

5

Other Participant Data

  • Cooperating teachers
  • University instuctors

Duration of Data Collection

  • 1 year

Data Sources

  • Classroom Discussion
  • Interviews
  • literature circle discussions
  • Reflective journals
  • Researcher journals
  • Video
  • Written reflections

Data Analysis Tools

  • Descriptive Analysis
  • Open coding
  • Qualitative Analysis
  • Triangulation

Researcher Positionality

  • inside (staying their own students)
  • Inside (studying their own programs)

Research Questions

What does it mean for a preservice teacher to have a "quality" field service experience?
Is this research question explicit from the manuscript? Yes
What is a quality preservice field experience within a professional development school?
Is this research question explicit from the manuscript? Yes
Can the teacher/student teacher/supervisor relationship be expanded to include all participants in a community of inquiry?
Is this research question explicit from the manuscript? Yes
What structures can be changed to facilitate the change in the relationship?
Is this research question explicit from the manuscript? Yes

Categories

2PTI Category: Preservice teacher identity, knowledge, beliefs, attitudes, and/or orientation (ikbao) toward literacy or the teaching of literacy.

2PTP Category: Preservice teachers teaching practices (including shifts in teaching practices as a function of growth or context).

4FIS Category: Field Experiences: inside schools

4CTM Category: Cooperating/mentor teachers

7CHG Topic: Coaching

1TEP Category: Teacher educator practices.

5SPP Category: Structure of preparation program.

7RES: Research

4FUS Category: University facilitators/supervisors

Comments

Subscribe
Notify of
Please login to comment
0 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted

© 2015–2026 The University of Texas at Austin
Supported by the Office of Instructional Innovation
Web Privacy Policy | Web Accessibility Policy | Contact

The University of Texas at Austin College of Education

The Literacy Research Association provided pilot funding for portions of this project.

wpDiscuz
0
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x
| Reply
wpDiscuz
0
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x
| Reply