Negotiating scripts, humanizing practice: Remaking methods instruction in an era of standardization
Abstract
This article highlights two key problems of practice the author faced as the instructor of an elementary literacy methods class for Teach for America corps members in a large, northeastern city during an era characterized by strict state and district control: the deficit perspectives the corps members held of their students and the lack of autonomy they experienced as educators. The author illustrates how each of these issues can be traced to the institutions that socialized the corps members into the profession and then draws on practitioner inquiry methodology to describe two possible pedagogical responses. The author concludes by discussing the implications of this work with particular attention to (1) how various institutions frame teaching and learning, (2) the role of methods courses in interrupting these frames, and (3) the pedagogical possibilities inherent in doing so for both students and teachers.
Reference
Crawford-Garrett, K. (2016). Negotiating scripts, humanizing practice: Remaking methods instruction in an era of standardization. Action in Teacher Education, 38(3), 240-258.
Journal
Action in Teacher Education
Analysis
Is this article part of a larger project or series of studies?
no
Does this study draw on a large, preexisting data set?
no
Research Approach
Geographic Setting
Institutional Context
- Teacher training institute
Certification Level
Programatic Focus
Research Location Context
- TFA Elementary Methods Course
Preservice Participants
Preservice Sample Size
32
Duration of Data Collection
Data Sources
- Classroom Discussion
- Focus group discussions
- Observations
Data Analysis Tools
- open coding and examined for emergent themes
Researcher Positionality
- inside (staying their own students)
Research Questions
What frameworks concerning urban education do TFA corps members bring to bear on urban classrooms?
Is this research question explicit from the manuscript? Yes
How do these frameworks shape and inform their curricular and pedagogical practice? Their interactions with their schools, the District, Teach for America, and the University?
Is this research question explicit from the manuscript? Yes
What happens when TFA corps members are invited to consider the knowledge of students, families, and communities as a starting point for curriculum design and pedagogy?
Is this research question explicit from the manuscript? Yes
Categories
2PTI Category: Preservice teacher identity, knowledge, beliefs, attitudes, and/or orientation (ikbao) toward literacy or the teaching of literacy.
7PTB Topic: Preservice teacher beliefs about students, families communities etc
2PTP Category: Preservice teachers teaching practices (including shifts in teaching practices as a function of growth or context).
1TEC Category: Teacher educator practices focused on institutional structures, constraints and pressures.
1TEI Category: Teacher educator identity, knowledge, beliefs, attitudes, and/or orientation (ikbao) to literacy or teacher preparation in literacy.
1TEP Category: Teacher educator practices.
1TES Category: Teacher educator practices focused on surrounding external/political pressures.
3CCE Category: Course experiences – the work that is done in a course to promote the content.
3CCT Category: Course content -- Content of instruction (including TE's teaching with technology) and the experiences in the course that relate to this content.