CITE-ITEL A dialogical synthesis of research into initial literacy teacher preparation
Login

Navigating Tensions in the Process of Change: An English Educator’s Dilemma Management in the Revision and Implementation of a Diversity-Infused Methods Course

Abstract

In response to growing concerns among faculty regarding the lack of attention to the bilingual student population in our pre-service teacher education program, the authors engaged in a shared self-study of the process of revising and implementing a secondary English methods course with explicit attention to the special needs of bilingual/bicultural learners. The paper describes how the second author, an English educator, with support from the first author, a mentor/colleague in bilingual education, identified and negotiated tensions and dilemmas that arose in a process of curricular transformation toward culturally and linguistically responsive teacher education practice. The study highlights several points of disjuncture, or critical turning points, experienced by the English educator and the ways in which she navigated the contradictions that resulted at these points of disjuncture through conversation with her mentor. Our documentation and articulation of this process may assist content area teacher educators in negotiating new knowledge and creating strategies for managing the dilemmas in practice that arise in the design and implementation of revised course curricula aimed at supporting culturally and linguistically diverse learners.

Reference

  • Gort, M., & Glenn, W. J. (2010). Navigating Tensions in the Process of Change: An English Educator’s Dilemma Management in the Revision and Implementation of a Diversity-Infused Methods Course. Research in the Teaching of English, 45(1), 59–86.

Journal

Research in the Teaching of English

Analysis

Is this article part of a larger project or series of studies?

yes

Does this study draw on a large, preexisting data set?

no

Research Approach

  • Self-Study

Geographic Setting

  • northeast US

Institutional Context

  • University based

Certification Level

  • Secondary

Programatic Focus

  • English

Research Location Context

  • English Methods Course
  • University

Preservice Participants

  • Undergraduates (university based program)

Preservice Sample Size

12

Other Participant Data

  • Teacher Educators

Duration of Data Collection

  • 4 to 6 months

Data Sources

  • fieldnotes
  • narrative journals
  • Post-lesson conferences
  • retrospective notes

Data Analysis Tools

  • Constant comparative analysis
  • Self-Study

Researcher Positionality

  • Inside (studying their own practices)

Research Questions

How did one secondary English methods teacher educator negotiate the different tensions and dilemmas that arose in the process of curricular transformation toward culturally and linguistically responsive teacher education practice (with help from a bilingual specialist and mentor)? Here's a later exact quote of the question: "How might a content area teacher educator negotiate new knowledge and create strategies for managing the dilemmas in practice that arise in the design and implementation of revised course curricula aimed at supporting culturally and linguistically diverse learners?" (p.64)
Is this research question explicit from the manuscript? Yes

Categories

7SIU Topic: Sociocultural Influences and Understandings

1TEI Category: Teacher educator identity, knowledge, beliefs, attitudes, and/or orientation (ikbao) to literacy or teacher preparation in literacy.

1TEP Category: Teacher educator practices.

3CCT Category: Course content -- Content of instruction (including TE's teaching with technology) and the experiences in the course that relate to this content.

6GIL Category: Graduates impact on students’ literacy.

7SEC Topic: English (Secondary)

7CRP Topic: Culturally relevant and responsive pedagogy

7LAL Topic: Literacy and additional languages

8A Topic: Findings in Need of a Category

Comments

Subscribe
Notify of
Please login to comment
0 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted

© 2015–2026 The University of Texas at Austin
Supported by the Office of Instructional Innovation
Web Privacy Policy | Web Accessibility Policy | Contact

The University of Texas at Austin College of Education

The Literacy Research Association provided pilot funding for portions of this project.

wpDiscuz
0
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x
| Reply
wpDiscuz
0
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x
| Reply