CITE-ITEL A dialogical synthesis of research into initial literacy teacher preparation
Login

Mentoring student teachers to design and implement literacy tasks that support self-regulated reading and writing

Abstract

Self-regulated learning (SRL) researchers have paid relatively little atten-
tion to questions concerning (a) the level of experience and expertise
required to create high-SRL environments, (b) how teachers acquire such
expertise, and (c) how expert instruction needs to be to influence students’
SRL positively. We agree with Randi and Corno (2000) that this is an
important area of inquiry if instruction about SRL is to become as wide-
spread as researchers think it should be. This study examined whether
and how beginning teachers can be mentored to design tasks and develop
practices that foster SRL in elementary school students. Observations of
language arts lessons were analyzed to determine the extent to which
student teachers’ tasks and practices created opportunities for children
to engage in self-regulated reading and writing. Most student teachers
(85
%
) received a high SRL score, indicating they were designing tasks
and engaging in practices that supported development of and engagement
in self-regulated reading and writing. A detailed description of the
support provided to student teachers for their development of high-SRL
practices is provided, along with narrative descriptions of high SRL tasks
and practices in two student teachers’ classrooms.

Reference

  • Perry, N. E., Hutchinson, L., & Thauberger, C. (2007). Mentoring student teachers to design and implement literacy tasks that support self-regulated reading and writing. Reading & Writing Quarterly: Overcoming Learning Difficulties, 23(1), 27–50.

Journal

Reading and Writing Quarterly

Analysis

Is this article part of a larger project or series of studies?

yes

Does this study draw on a large, preexisting data set?

no

Research Approach

  • "longitudinal": across varying classes over time
  • Qualitiative

Geographic Setting

  • Canada

Institutional Context

  • University based

Certification Level

  • Elementary

Programatic Focus

  • Self-regulated Learning Cohort

Research Location Context

  • field placements (not related to methods courses)
  • University

Preservice Participants

  • undergraduate preservice teachers

Preservice Sample Size

18

Other Participant Data

  • Mentors (experienced teachers)

Duration of Data Collection

  • Academic Semester

Data Sources

  • Audio recordings
  • Cooperating Teacher Feedback
  • Interviews
  • lesson plans
  • Observations
  • Unit plans

Data Analysis Tools

  • coding to a prior categories

Researcher Positionality

  • inside (staying their own students)

Research Questions

"What level of experience/expertise is required to create high- SRL environments?" (p.10)
Is this research question explicit from the manuscript? Yes
"How can teachers gain such expertise?" (p.10).
Is this research question explicit from the manuscript? Yes
"How expert must instruction be to influence young students’ SRL positively?" (p.10)
Is this research question explicit from the manuscript? Yes

Categories

1TEP Category: Teacher educator practices.

7CHG Topic: Coaching

2PTP Category: Preservice teachers teaching practices (including shifts in teaching practices as a function of growth or context).

4CTM Category: Cooperating/mentor teachers

Comments

Subscribe
Notify of
Please login to comment
0 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted

© 2015–2026 The University of Texas at Austin
Supported by the Office of Instructional Innovation
Web Privacy Policy | Web Accessibility Policy | Contact

The University of Texas at Austin College of Education

The Literacy Research Association provided pilot funding for portions of this project.

wpDiscuz
0
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x
| Reply
wpDiscuz
0
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x
| Reply