CITE-ITEL A dialogical synthesis of research into initial literacy teacher preparation
Login

Learning to teach struggling (and non-struggling) elementary school readers: An analysis of preservice teachers’ knowledges

Abstract

The purpose of this research was to describe elementary school preservice teachers' beliefs. understandings. and instruction of struggling and non-struggling readers as they evolved over time in two university reading education courses with a field component. Using a qualitative content analysis. we analyzed the assignments of 22 preservice teachers across one year of their teacher education program. We found that, throughout the year, preservice teachers improved in their abilities to integrate their personal, practical, and professional knowledges to inform their reading instruction. Their misunderstandings surrounding reading instruction decreased while their abilities to examine reading instruction critically and estimations of their preparedness to teach struggling readers increased. Preservice teachers' views about the value of assessing students' reading proficiency became increasingly more positive as did perceptions about the importance of tutoring struggling readers. Finally, implications are made to suggest how university reading education courses may support the lean-ing and development of future preservice teachers.

Reference

  • Duffy, A. & Atkinson, T. (2001). Learning to teach struggling (and non‐struggling) elementary school readers: An analysis of preservice teachers’ knowledges. Reading Research and Instruction, 41(1), 83-102. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19388070109558359

Journal

Reading Research and Instruction

Analysis

Is this article part of a larger project or series of studies?

no

Does this study draw on a large, preexisting data set?

no

Research Approach

  • "longitudinal": across varying classes over time
  • Action Research
  • Design Development
  • design study
  • qualitative content analysis
  • Qualitiative

Geographic Setting

  • University of North Carolina at Greensboro

Institutional Context

  • University based

Certification Level

  • 1-6

Programatic Focus

  • Elementary

Research Location Context

  • Elementary school
  • field-based methods course

Preservice Participants

  • undergraduates in a Reading Methods course

Preservice Sample Size

22

Other Participant Data

  • University Professor

Duration of Data Collection

  • 2 academic semesters

Data Sources

  • class assignment reflections
  • email correspondence
  • Literacy history

Data Analysis Tools

  • Qualitative Content Analysis

Researcher Positionality

  • inside (staying their own students)

Research Questions

What are the processes that elementary pre-service teachers go through as they learn and continue to learn to teach reading?
Is this research question explicit from the manuscript? Combination
How did preservice teachers' beliefs, understandings, and instruction of struggling and non struggling readers evolve over time in two university reading education courses with field components?
Is this research question explicit from the manuscript? Combination

Categories

2PTI Category: Preservice teacher identity, knowledge, beliefs, attitudes, and/or orientation (ikbao) toward literacy or the teaching of literacy.

2PTP Category: Preservice teachers teaching practices (including shifts in teaching practices as a function of growth or context).

3CCE Category: Course experiences – the work that is done in a course to promote the content.

4FIS Category: Field Experiences: inside schools

1TEI Category: Teacher educator identity, knowledge, beliefs, attitudes, and/or orientation (ikbao) to literacy or teacher preparation in literacy.

Comments

Subscribe
Notify of
Please login to comment
0 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted

© 2015–2026 The University of Texas at Austin
Supported by the Office of Instructional Innovation
Web Privacy Policy | Web Accessibility Policy | Contact

The University of Texas at Austin College of Education

The Literacy Research Association provided pilot funding for portions of this project.

wpDiscuz
0
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x
| Reply
wpDiscuz
0
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x
| Reply