CITE-ITEL A dialogical synthesis of research into initial literacy teacher preparation
Login

Learning from experience: Preservice teachers’ perceptions of literature discussions.

Abstract

This study explored the development of preservice teachers' perceptual knowledge of literary responses. Forty elementary preservice teachers read books and conducted eight discussions with children in primary and elementary classrooms. The preservice teachers kept journals in which they reflected about what they learned from the experience. The overarching research question was: What do preservice teachers learn about literary responses from literature discussions? Journal reflections and written responses to two questionnaires were analyzed qualitatively using grounded theory methods (Bogdan & Biklen, 1992; Glaser & Strauss, 1967). Major themes of understanding that emerged included a focus on instructional practice, student response, grouping practices, intertextual connections, collaboration, reading and writing connections, cultural awareness, and factors of engagement. An overwhelming majority of preservice teachers' perceptions focused on the children's interactions and meaning constructions. Reflections revealed that they perceived reading and response to literature as a transactional experience of exploration and of personal involvement in the story world. One of the challenges mentioned by several was managing the abundance of talk. Nonetheless, the majority of preservice teachers felt that children benefited from the free and open discussion forum because it allowed for multiple responses that encouraged active meaning-making. All of the preservice teachers indicated that they would definitely hold literature discussions in the future.

Reference

  • Dugan, J. A. R. (1999). Learning from experience: Preservice teachers' perceptions of literature discussions. Yearbook of the College Reading Association, 21, 183-200.

Journal

Yearbook of the College Reading Association

Analysis

Is this article part of a larger project or series of studies?

no

Does this study draw on a large, preexisting data set?

no

Research Approach

  • Grounded theory

Geographic Setting

  • Midwestern USA
  • Southwestern United States

Institutional Context

  • University based

Certification Level

  • Elementary

Programatic Focus

  • reading specialization

Research Location Context

  • field-based methods course

Preservice Participants

  • undergraduates in a Reading Methods course

Preservice Sample Size

40

Duration of Data Collection

  • 1 semester

Data Sources

  • Reflective journals
  • Survey

Data Analysis Tools

  • grounded theory
  • Qualitative Analysis

Researcher Positionality

  • inside (staying their own students)

Research Questions

What do preservice teachers learn about literary response from literature discussions?
Is this research question explicit from the manuscript? Yes

Categories

7CLT Topic: Children's Literature

1TEP Category: Teacher educator practices.

2PTI Category: Preservice teacher identity, knowledge, beliefs, attitudes, and/or orientation (ikbao) toward literacy or the teaching of literacy.

2PTP Category: Preservice teachers teaching practices (including shifts in teaching practices as a function of growth or context).

3CCT Category: Course content -- Content of instruction (including TE's teaching with technology) and the experiences in the course that relate to this content.

Comments

Subscribe
Notify of
Please login to comment
0 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted

© 2015–2026 The University of Texas at Austin
Supported by the Office of Instructional Innovation
Web Privacy Policy | Web Accessibility Policy | Contact

The University of Texas at Austin College of Education

The Literacy Research Association provided pilot funding for portions of this project.

wpDiscuz
0
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x
| Reply
wpDiscuz
0
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x
| Reply