CITE-ITEL A dialogical synthesis of research into initial literacy teacher preparation
Login

Integrating Academic Language into Content Methodology: Supporting Math and Science Teacher Candidates to Meet Students’ Language Needs

Abstract

This article describes how a teacher-education program (TEP), whose mission is to improve schooling for linguistically diverse students, develops its’ teacher candidate’s critical dispositions and pedagogy related to academic-language (AL) development and how candidate performance on PACT can help TEPs better assess and improve how AL development can be embedded in content methodology courses. We discuss (a) how TEP worked to embed AL into the program course of study, (b) how teacher education faculty support AL in their content methodology courses, (c) the ways in which teacher candidates demonstrate knowledge of AL in two exemplary PACT Teaching Events, and (d) how TEP used data analysis of PACT for program improvement.

Reference

  • Freking, F., Park, J., & Francois, A. (2015). Integrating Academic Language into Content Methodology: Supporting Math and Science Teacher Candidates to Meet Students’ Language Needs. The New Educator, 11(1), 60-78.

Journal

New Educator

Analysis

Is this article part of a larger project or series of studies?

no

Does this study draw on a large, preexisting data set?

no

Research Approach

  • Case study
  • Qualitiative

Geographic Setting

  • University of California Los Angeles (UCLA)

Institutional Context

  • University based

Certification Level

  • Multiple levels of certification across programs

Programatic Focus

  • interdisciplinary liteacy

Research Location Context

  • University

Preservice Participants

  • Undergraduates (university based program)

Preservice Sample Size

153

Other Participant Data

  • Teacher Educators

Duration of Data Collection

  • 2 academic semesters

Data Sources

  • Survey
  • Syllabi from University courses
  • Teaching Events

Data Analysis Tools

  • coding (non-specific)

Researcher Positionality

  • inside (staying their own students)
  • Inside (studying their own programs)

Research Questions

How is academic language embedded in the teacher education program?
Is this research question explicit from the manuscript? No
How does the embedding of academic language (AL) in the teacher education program impact mathematics and science teacher performance on the AL rubrics in PACT?
Is this research question explicit from the manuscript? Combination

Categories

6GLP Category: Graduates literacy practices in classrooms

2PTI Category: Preservice teacher identity, knowledge, beliefs, attitudes, and/or orientation (ikbao) toward literacy or the teaching of literacy.

3CCE Category: Course experiences – the work that is done in a course to promote the content.

7CDL Topic: Content area literacy

4FIS Category: Field Experiences: inside schools

2PTP Category: Preservice teachers teaching practices (including shifts in teaching practices as a function of growth or context).

5FPP Category: Focus of the preparation program

1TEP Category: Teacher educator practices.

5SPP Category: Structure of preparation program.

Comments

Subscribe
Notify of
Please login to comment
0 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted

© 2015–2026 The University of Texas at Austin
Supported by the Office of Instructional Innovation
Web Privacy Policy | Web Accessibility Policy | Contact

The University of Texas at Austin College of Education

The Literacy Research Association provided pilot funding for portions of this project.

wpDiscuz
0
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x
| Reply
wpDiscuz
0
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x
| Reply