CITE-ITEL A dialogical synthesis of research into initial literacy teacher preparation
Login

“I couldn’t have learned this any other way”: Learning to teach literacy across concurrent practicum experiences

Abstract

The authors, a team of literacy teacher educators who are focused on extending our own understandings of preservice teacher (PST) learning, conducted a cross-case analysis of how PSTs learned to teach literacy in three concurrent practicum experiences. We draw on Grossman’s framework of representations, decompositions, and approximations to describe and interpret what PSTs learned. Through a focus on one student, Deanna, the authors illustrate three findings: PSTs came to value the variety of forms of students’ literacies that reflected their ages, language backgrounds, and cultures/identities; they came to understand that relationships are essential to teaching and learning, and building relationships requires “putting myself out there” as well as “getting to know you”; and coming to know about students’ literacies in contexts in which students can talk, read, make images, and write from life allowed PSTs to coconstruct a curriculum that followed the students’ leads. The concurrence of practicum experience allowed for deepened reflections and understandings of literacy teaching. To extend Grossman’s work, the authors suggest the importance of using artifacts of PSTs’ own practices as representations in a cycle of reflection.

Reference

  • Mosley Wetzel, M., L. Roser, N., Hoffman, J. V., Antonio Martínez, R., & Price-Dennis, D. (2016). “I couldn’t have learned this any other way”: Learning to teach literacy across concurrent practicum experiences. Action in Teacher Education, 38(1), 70-85.

Journal

Action in Teacher Education

Analysis

Is this article part of a larger project or series of studies?

no

Does this study draw on a large, preexisting data set?

no

Research Approach

  • Qualitiative

Geographic Setting

  • not stated

Institutional Context

  • University based

Certification Level

  • Elementary

Programatic Focus

  • Literacy Education

Research Location Context

  • Adult ESOL Methods Course
  • Elementary school
  • field placements (not related to methods courses)
  • field-based literacy assessment and instruction course

Preservice Participants

  • Undergraduates (university based program)

Preservice Sample Size

11

Duration of Data Collection

  • 1 semester

Data Sources

  • artifacts
  • assignments
  • Classroom Discussion
  • fieldnotes
  • Interviews
  • lesson plans
  • Observation of PT lessons
  • reflective essay
  • Written reflections

Data Analysis Tools

  • cross-case analysis
  • Open coding

Researcher Positionality

  • inside (staying their own students)
  • Outside (not directly invested in the program or operations)

Research Questions

"In what ways do concurrent practicum experiences, across different contexts, support preservice teachers in building new linkages and understandings of what it means to be literate and to be a responsive teacher of literacy?" (p. 71)
Is this research question explicit from the manuscript? Yes

Categories

2PTP Category: Preservice teachers teaching practices (including shifts in teaching practices as a function of growth or context).

3CCE Category: Course experiences – the work that is done in a course to promote the content.

4FIS Category: Field Experiences: inside schools

3CCT Category: Course content -- Content of instruction (including TE's teaching with technology) and the experiences in the course that relate to this content.

6GIL Category: Graduates impact on students’ literacy.

5SPP Category: Structure of preparation program.

7CRP Topic: Culturally relevant and responsive pedagogy

7PTB Topic: Preservice teacher beliefs about students, families communities etc

2PTI Category: Preservice teacher identity, knowledge, beliefs, attitudes, and/or orientation (ikbao) toward literacy or the teaching of literacy.

6GLP Category: Graduates literacy practices in classrooms

Comments

Subscribe
Notify of
Please login to comment
0 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted

© 2015–2026 The University of Texas at Austin
Supported by the Office of Instructional Innovation
Web Privacy Policy | Web Accessibility Policy | Contact

The University of Texas at Austin College of Education

The Literacy Research Association provided pilot funding for portions of this project.

wpDiscuz
0
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x
| Reply
wpDiscuz
0
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x
| Reply