CITE-ITEL A dialogical synthesis of research into initial literacy teacher preparation
Login

Generative learning in a service-learning project and field-base teacher education program: Learning to become culturally responsive teachers

Abstract

Research on literacy tutoring such as working in an after-school reading or writing club, situated as a service-learning project, suggests that such work can foster culturally responsive teaching for prospective teachers by increasing additive perspectives toward students from diverse backgrounds and transforming views of diversity. The purpose of this qualitative study was to document the value of participating in a semester long, field- based university course combined with a service-learning program to enhance prospective teachers’ generative learning of culturally responsive pedagogy. Building on generative learning theories, we identified the ways prospective teachers became more metacogni- tive of their past experiences and beliefs, developed caring relationships, and gained confidence about the positive impact they were having on students’ literacy learning.

Reference

  • Assaf, L. & López, M.M. (2015).  Generative learning in a service-learning project and field-base teacher education program: Learning to become culturally responsive teachers. Literacy Research: Theory, Method, and Practice, 64, 323-338.

Journal

Literacy Research: Theory, Method, and Practice

Analysis

Is this article part of a larger project or series of studies?

no

Does this study draw on a large, preexisting data set?

no

Research Approach

  • Ethnographic
  • Qualitiative

Geographic Setting

  • Southwestern United States

Institutional Context

  • University based

Certification Level

  • Elementary

Programatic Focus

  • Elementary

Research Location Context

  • Elementary school
  • Literacy methods course

Preservice Participants

  • Undergraduates in a Reading and Language Arts methods course

Preservice Sample Size

Other Participant Data

  • University Professor

Duration of Data Collection

  • Academic Semester

Data Sources

  • artifacts
  • assignments
  • conversations among teacher educators
  • Interviews
  • lesson plans
  • preservice teachers' audit trail
  • reflections
  • Researcher journals

Data Analysis Tools

  • Constant comparative analysis
  • Ethnographic analysis
  • Interpretive Framework (Erickson, 1986)

Researcher Positionality

  • inside (staying their own students)
  • Outside (not directly invested in the program or operations)

Research Questions

"In what ways does participating in a service- learning program combined with a field-based teaching course mediates prospective teachers’ generative learning of CRP?" (p. 324).
Is this research question explicit from the manuscript? Yes

Categories

2PTI Category: Preservice teacher identity, knowledge, beliefs, attitudes, and/or orientation (ikbao) toward literacy or the teaching of literacy.

2PTL Category: Preservice teachers own literacy (experiences and practices).

2PTP Category: Preservice teachers teaching practices (including shifts in teaching practices as a function of growth or context).

3CCE Category: Course experiences – the work that is done in a course to promote the content.

4FIS Category: Field Experiences: inside schools

7CRP Topic: Culturally relevant and responsive pedagogy

7REP Topic: Reflection and the reflective practitioner

7TUT Topic: Tutoring

7SIU Topic: Sociocultural Influences and Understandings

7LAL Topic: Literacy and additional languages

Comments

Subscribe
Notify of
Please login to comment
0 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted

© 2015–2026 The University of Texas at Austin
Supported by the Office of Instructional Innovation
Web Privacy Policy | Web Accessibility Policy | Contact

The University of Texas at Austin College of Education

The Literacy Research Association provided pilot funding for portions of this project.

wpDiscuz
0
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x
| Reply
wpDiscuz
0
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x
| Reply