CITE-ITEL A dialogical synthesis of research into initial literacy teacher preparation
Login

Exploring identities in a reading specialization program.

Abstract

This qualitative study used theories of language and learning to explore the identities of one preservice teacher in a reading specialization program. Data sources included archived online course responses, interviews, journals, and an electronic portfolio. Analysis indicates that the participant used multiple discourses as an immigrant, multilanguage learner, and writer/poet to make sense of her learning in the program. These discourses shaped her identities as a teacher and influenced how her peers recognized her. Analyzing online responses over time added to the uniqueness of this study because it allowed the researcher to tap into shared discourse related to course readings and field-based experiences. Negotiating multiple discourses within a learning community influenced the participant's instructional decisions as a student teacher and fashioned her identity with other future teachers. Implications include the significance of exploring multiple identities in relation to a clearly identified program mission, using computer mediated discussions to nurture collaborative reflection, and understanding how a group's common values and commitments can enhance one's teaching identity.

Reference

  • Assaf, L. C.  (2005).  Exploring identities in a reading specialization program.  Journal of Literacy Research, 37(2), 201-236.  http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15548430jlr3702_4

Journal

Journal of Literacy Research

Analysis

Is this article part of a larger project or series of studies?

no

Does this study draw on a large, preexisting data set?

no

Research Approach

  • Case study
  • Qualitiative

Geographic Setting

  • Southwestern United States

Institutional Context

  • University based

Certification Level

  • Elementary

Programatic Focus

  • Elementary
  • reading specialization

Research Location Context

  • field-based methods course
  • University

Preservice Participants

  • Post bachs (university based program)
  • Undergraduates (university based program)

Preservice Sample Size

30

Duration of Data Collection

  • 3 semesters

Data Sources

  • email correspondence
  • First Week of School Journal
  • Interviews
  • journal entries
  • Observations
  • online discussions
  • portfolio
  • Reflective journals

Data Analysis Tools

  • coding- qualitative software "Nudist"
  • Constant comparative analysis
  • Discourse Analysis (Gee, 1999 framework)
  • Triangulation

Researcher Positionality

  • inside (staying their own students)

Research Questions

"What is the nature of one preservice teachers' discourse in a reading specialization program?"
Is this research question explicit from the manuscript? Yes
"How does identity influence the choices one makes and instructional practices one uses as a teacher?"
Is this research question explicit from the manuscript? Yes
"What does one's discourse in a reading specialization program reveal about learning to become a teacher?"
Is this research question explicit from the manuscript? Yes

Categories

2PTI Category: Preservice teacher identity, knowledge, beliefs, attitudes, and/or orientation (ikbao) toward literacy or the teaching of literacy.

2PTL Category: Preservice teachers own literacy (experiences and practices).

3CCE Category: Course experiences – the work that is done in a course to promote the content.

4FIS Category: Field Experiences: inside schools

7PTB Topic: Preservice teacher beliefs about students, families communities etc

Comments

Subscribe
Notify of
Please login to comment
0 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted

© 2015–2026 The University of Texas at Austin
Supported by the Office of Instructional Innovation
Web Privacy Policy | Web Accessibility Policy | Contact

The University of Texas at Austin College of Education

The Literacy Research Association provided pilot funding for portions of this project.

wpDiscuz
0
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x
| Reply
wpDiscuz
0
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x
| Reply