CITE-ITEL A dialogical synthesis of research into initial literacy teacher preparation
Login

Enacting High Leverage Practices in English Methods: The Case of Discussion

Abstract

Though literature discussions are a commonplace feature of English classrooms, we know little about how teachers learn to facilitate classroom talk. Research on methods courses reveals little about how, or if, teachers are prepared to enact the “high leverage” practice of literature discussions. This qualitative study examines an English methods unit on discussion and the practices that the novices later enacted in the field. Sociocultural theory is used to analyze how the novices’ enacted particular features of discussions and how these activities afforded them opportunities to practice the facilitative roles that teachers play. The findings suggest that the novices had difficulty understanding their roles as teachers in student-centered activities, and that teacher educators must curricularize enactments to help novices learn what teachers actually do when enacting high leverage practices like discussions.

Reference

  • Williamson, P. (2013). Enacting high leverage practices in English methods: The case of discussion. English Education, 46(1), 34.

Journal

English Education

Analysis

Is this article part of a larger project or series of studies?

yes

Does this study draw on a large, preexisting data set?

no

Research Approach

  • Case study
  • Qualitiative

Geographic Setting

  • western united states

Institutional Context

  • University based

Certification Level

  • High School
  • Secondary

Programatic Focus

Research Location Context

  • Literacy methods course
  • student teaching placement schools

Preservice Participants

  • certification program

Preservice Sample Size

2

Duration of Data Collection

  • Academic Semester

Data Sources

  • assignments
  • fieldnotes
  • Interviews
  • Video
  • video reflection (stimulated recall)

Data Analysis Tools

  • Case study analysis
  • coding (non-specific)
  • Discourse Analysis (Gee, 1999 framework)

Researcher Positionality

  • inside (staying their own students)
  • Inside (studying their own practices)

Research Questions

This qualitative study examines an English methods unit on discussion and the practices that the novices later enacted in the field.
Is this research question explicit from the manuscript? Unknown

Categories

1TEP Category: Teacher educator practices.

2PTI Category: Preservice teacher identity, knowledge, beliefs, attitudes, and/or orientation (ikbao) toward literacy or the teaching of literacy.

2PTP Category: Preservice teachers teaching practices (including shifts in teaching practices as a function of growth or context).

3CCE Category: Course experiences – the work that is done in a course to promote the content.

4FIS Category: Field Experiences: inside schools

7DDA Topic: Discussion/Dialogic approaches

7SEC Topic: English (Secondary)

Comments

Subscribe
Notify of
Please login to comment
0 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted

© 2015–2026 The University of Texas at Austin
Supported by the Office of Instructional Innovation
Web Privacy Policy | Web Accessibility Policy | Contact

The University of Texas at Austin College of Education

The Literacy Research Association provided pilot funding for portions of this project.

wpDiscuz
0
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x
| Reply
wpDiscuz
0
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x
| Reply