CITE-ITEL A dialogical synthesis of research into initial literacy teacher preparation
Login

Critical conversations in English education: Discursive strategies for examining how teacher and student identities shape classroom discourse.

Abstract

This research examined how preservice teachers in a university classroom used discourse analysis of video-recorded lessons to explore how identity markers such as race shaped classroom interactions. Findings from the study indicated that preservice teachers employed 10 different discursive strategies to engage in critical conversations. Identifying these discursive strategies offered insight into preservice teachers’ entry points for engaging in such dialogue. From that information, we offer potential narrative starters and questions that educators could use to deepen critical conversations in their English education courses.

Reference

  • Vetter, A., Schieble, M. & Meacham, M. (2018). Critical conversations in English education: Discursive strategies for examining how teacher and student identities shape classroom discourse. English Education, 50(3), 255-282.

Journal

English Education

Analysis

Is this article part of a larger project or series of studies?

no

Does this study draw on a large, preexisting data set?

no

Research Approach

  • critical
  • racial literacy

Geographic Setting

  • southeast

Institutional Context

  • University based

Certification Level

  • English Education

Programatic Focus

  • English

Research Location Context

  • student-teaching seminar

Preservice Participants

  • Undergraduates (university based program)

Preservice Sample Size

12

Duration of Data Collection

  • 1 semester

Data Sources

  • Transcriptions
  • Video Recordings of Seminar Discussions

Data Analysis Tools

  • Critical Discourse Analysis

Researcher Positionality

  • inside (staying their own students)

Research Questions

What kinds of discursive strategies did preservice teachers use in a university seminar to examine how identity markers shaped classroom interactions during student teaching? By weaving together multiple strategies in the small- and large-group discussions, preservice teachers were able to think about their practice at both local and structural levels.
Is this research question explicit from the manuscript? Yes

Categories

3CCE Category: Course experiences – the work that is done in a course to promote the content.

3CCT Category: Course content -- Content of instruction (including TE's teaching with technology) and the experiences in the course that relate to this content.

2PTI Category: Preservice teacher identity, knowledge, beliefs, attitudes, and/or orientation (ikbao) toward literacy or the teaching of literacy.

7CRL Topic: Critical literacy

7DDA Topic: Discussion/Dialogic approaches

7SEC Topic: English (Secondary)

7SIU Topic: Sociocultural Influences and Understandings

Comments

Subscribe
Notify of
Please login to comment
0 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted

© 2015–2026 The University of Texas at Austin
Supported by the Office of Instructional Innovation
Web Privacy Policy | Web Accessibility Policy | Contact

The University of Texas at Austin College of Education

The Literacy Research Association provided pilot funding for portions of this project.

wpDiscuz
0
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x
| Reply
wpDiscuz
0
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x
| Reply