CITE-ITEL A dialogical synthesis of research into initial literacy teacher preparation
Login

Creating an articulate classroom: examining pre-service teachers’ experiences of talk

Abstract

This paper examines the continuing ‘issue’ of developing classrooms where talk is used as means of building concepts and understanding. As curriculum guidance increasingly refers to ‘exploratory talk’ and ‘dialogic talk’, it questions why practice seems resistant to change, despite the promotion of social constructivist approaches to learning in university. Research has suggested that at the heart of the matter are the ‘inflexible’ values and beliefs that primary postgraduate trainees bring to initial teacher training programmes and a tendency to default to observed practice. Drawing on data from the first phase of a small-scale study of one cohort of 75 trainees, the paper suggests that the difficulty some students experience in engaging in exploratory dialogue, and promoting it in the classroom, is not wholly driven by these factors. It argues that we also need to consider the tension between negative memories of classrooms characterised by ‘all listening and no communication’, which is the resultant legacy of low self-confidence in answering and raising questions, and the emergent understanding that there might be a better way to give children a voice. Students suffering from such cognitive dissonance are unlikely to develop sufficient confidence to create articulate classrooms.

Reference

  • Fisher, A. T. (2011). Creating an articulate classroom: Examining pre-service teachers' experiences of talk. Language and Education , 25(1), 33-47. doi: 10.1080/09500782.2010.519775

Journal

Language and Education

Analysis

Is this article part of a larger project or series of studies?

yes

Does this study draw on a large, preexisting data set?

no

Research Approach

  • Qualitiative

Geographic Setting

  • United Kingdom

Institutional Context

  • University based

Certification Level

  • Generalist

Programatic Focus

  • Elementary

Research Location Context

  • University

Preservice Participants

  • Post bachs (university based program)

Preservice Sample Size

Duration of Data Collection

  • two to three sittings

Data Sources

  • open ended questions
  • Transcriptions
  • University coursework assignment (e.g. writing/project done for a grade)

Data Analysis Tools

  • Content analysis

Researcher Positionality

  • inside (staying their own students)

Research Questions

What do preservice teachers remember about their own classroom experiences with dialogue?
Is this research question explicit from the manuscript? Combination
Did participants spontaneously link prior experiences [with classroom dialogue] to their current attitudes?
Is this research question explicit from the manuscript? Unknown

Categories

2PTL Category: Preservice teachers own literacy (experiences and practices).

7DDA Topic: Discussion/Dialogic approaches

3CCE Category: Course experiences – the work that is done in a course to promote the content.

Comments

Subscribe
Notify of
Please login to comment
0 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted

© 2015–2026 The University of Texas at Austin
Supported by the Office of Instructional Innovation
Web Privacy Policy | Web Accessibility Policy | Contact

The University of Texas at Austin College of Education

The Literacy Research Association provided pilot funding for portions of this project.

wpDiscuz
0
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x
| Reply
wpDiscuz
0
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x
| Reply