CITE-ITEL A dialogical synthesis of research into initial literacy teacher preparation
Login

Competing Centers of Gravity: A Beginning English Teacher’s Socialization Process within Conflictual Settings

Abstract

This case study follows a teacher candidate through her semester of student teaching English in a suburban high school in the U.S. Southeast. The study is part of a line of inquiry that investigates the factors that contribute to teachers’ development of concepts to guide their instruction. In particular, this research focuses on the mediational role of settings in teachers’ development of a teaching conception and the attributions made by the teacher candidate to the sources for her understanding of how to teach. Data for the research consist of observations and interviews with focal teacher Anita and key stakeholders. These data were analyzed to identify the pedagogical tools used during student teaching and the sources to which she attributed her learning of them. Findings indicate that Anita’s initial conception of teaching was complicated by competing centers of gravity—that is, settings with conflicting notions of effective practice—that pulled her in many different directions, thus making her ability to develop a coherent approach to teaching a challenge. The study concludes with a discussion of conventional linear views of concept development and how attention to the settings of learning to teach can help explain the difficulties of learning to teach in cohesive and consistent ways

Reference

  • Smagorinsky, P., Rhym, D., & Moore, C. P. (2013). Competing centers of gravity: A beginning English teacher's socialization process within conflictual settings. English Education, 45(2), 147.

Journal

English Education

Analysis

Is this article part of a larger project or series of studies?

yes

Does this study draw on a large, preexisting data set?

no

Research Approach

  • Case study
  • Qualitiative

Geographic Setting

  • Southeastern United States

Institutional Context

  • University based

Certification Level

  • High School
  • Secondary

Programatic Focus

  • Secondary

Research Location Context

  • student teaching placement schools

Preservice Participants

  • Undergraduates (university based program)

Preservice Sample Size

1

Duration of Data Collection

  • Academic Semester

Data Sources

  • artifacts
  • fieldnotes
  • Interviews
  • interviews (post-lesson)
  • Observations

Data Analysis Tools

  • coding to a prior categories
  • Inductive analysis

Researcher Positionality

  • inside (staying their own students)
  • Inside (studying their own programs)

Research Questions

What pedagogical tools did she employ during student teaching, and to what sources did she attribute her understanding of how to use them?
Is this research question explicit from the manuscript? Yes
To what degree did different sources identified as attributions byAnita provide compatible approaches to teaching and learning?
Is this research question explicit from the manuscript? Yes

Categories

1TEP Category: Teacher educator practices.

2PTI Category: Preservice teacher identity, knowledge, beliefs, attitudes, and/or orientation (ikbao) toward literacy or the teaching of literacy.

2PTP Category: Preservice teachers teaching practices (including shifts in teaching practices as a function of growth or context).

4FIS Category: Field Experiences: inside schools

7SEC Topic: English (Secondary)

Comments

Subscribe
Notify of
Please login to comment
0 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted

© 2015–2026 The University of Texas at Austin
Supported by the Office of Instructional Innovation
Web Privacy Policy | Web Accessibility Policy | Contact

The University of Texas at Austin College of Education

The Literacy Research Association provided pilot funding for portions of this project.

wpDiscuz
0
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x
| Reply
wpDiscuz
0
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x
| Reply