CITE-ITEL A dialogical synthesis of research into initial literacy teacher preparation
Login

Comparing traditional journal writing with journal writing shared over e-mail list serves as tools for facilitating reflective thinking: A study of preservice teachers

Abstract

To determine the conditions that would best encourage reflection in journal writing of preservice teachers in field-based reading internships, the degree of reflective content found in self-contained traditional journals was compared to the reflective content found in journal entries shared over e-mail list serves. Participants were 56 preservice teachers enrolled in reading internships in public schools operating in a variety of journal writing conditions in 1 of 5 semesters from fall 1999 through spring 2001. Results indicate that journals written under shared interactive e-mail conditions were significantly more likely to contain evidence of reflections than traditional journals. Reflections observed were also categorized into types described by Hatton and Smith (1995). Suggestions for implications for encouraging reflectivity during field-based internships in teacher education programs are presented.

Reference

  • Kaplan, D. S., Rupley, W. H., Sparks, J., & Holcomb, A.  (2007).  Comparing traditional journal writing with journal writing shared over e-mail list serves as tools for facilitating reflective thinking: A study of preservice teachers. Journal of Literacy Research, 39(3), 357-387.  http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10862960701613136

Journal

Journal of Literacy Research

Analysis

Is this article part of a larger project or series of studies?

no

Does this study draw on a large, preexisting data set?

no

Research Approach

  • Qualitiative
  • Quantitative

Geographic Setting

  • Texas

Institutional Context

  • University based

Certification Level

  • Elementary

Programatic Focus

  • Elementary
  • reading specialization

Research Location Context

  • field-based methods course
  • Reading and language arts methods course

Preservice Participants

  • Undergraduates (university based program)

Preservice Sample Size

145

Duration of Data Collection

  • 5 semesters

Data Sources

  • email correspondence
  • Reflective journals

Data Analysis Tools

  • coding (non-specific)

Researcher Positionality

  • inside (staying their own students)

Research Questions

"Do journals written through e-mail list serves contain more reflective thought units than journals written as paper-and-pencil journals in notebooks?"
Is this research question explicit from the manuscript? Yes
"Are there qualitative differences in the type of reflective entries written in journals written through e-mail list serves when compared to journals written as paper-and-pencil journals in notebooks?"
Is this research question explicit from the manuscript? Yes
"Are student or placement characteristics significantly related to the number of reflective thought units contained in student journals across both journal writing conditions?"
Is this research question explicit from the manuscript? Yes

Categories

2PTP Category: Preservice teachers teaching practices (including shifts in teaching practices as a function of growth or context).

3CCE Category: Course experiences – the work that is done in a course to promote the content.

7REP Topic: Reflection and the reflective practitioner

Comments

Subscribe
Notify of
Please login to comment
0 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted

© 2015–2026 The University of Texas at Austin
Supported by the Office of Instructional Innovation
Web Privacy Policy | Web Accessibility Policy | Contact

The University of Texas at Austin College of Education

The Literacy Research Association provided pilot funding for portions of this project.

wpDiscuz
0
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x
| Reply
wpDiscuz
0
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x
| Reply