CITE-ITEL A dialogical synthesis of research into initial literacy teacher preparation
Login

An examination of teacher education in literacy instruction and candidate perceptions of their learned literacy practices

Abstract

Using mixed-methods approaches and cross-case analysis procedures of a study of 10 teacher-preparation programs across the United States, researchers identified signature aspects of the programs that captured key elements unique to each institution and compared teacher candidate perceptions of learning with the expressed intentions of the faculty. The teacher candidates' perceptions of their learning were contextualized in terms of the 2003 to 2010 Standards for the Teaching Profession of the International Reading Association. Findings indicate some deficiencies across the institutions as well as many strengths and key attributes. Implications for teacher preparation programs and accountability of those programs are discussed. Further directions for research, including the second and third phases of this study, are suggested.

Reference

  • Wolsey, T. D., Young, J. R., Scales, R. Q., Scales, W. D., Lenski, S., Yoder, K. K., Wold, L., Grisham, D. L., Ganske, K., Dobler, E., & Chambers, S. A. (2013). An examination of teacher education in literacy instruction and candidate perceptions of their learned literacy practices. Action in Teacher Education, 35(3), 204-222. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01626620.2013.806230

Journal

Action in Teacher Education

Analysis

Is this article part of a larger project or series of studies?

yes

Does this study draw on a large, preexisting data set?

no

Research Approach

  • Case study
  • Quantitative

Geographic Setting

  • United States

Institutional Context

  • University based

Certification Level

  • K-6

Programatic Focus

  • Literacy Education

Research Location Context

  • University

Preservice Participants

  • Undergraduates (university based program)

Preservice Sample Size

301

Other Participant Data

  • Teacher Educators

Duration of Data Collection

  • Not clear

Data Sources

  • Document Analysis
  • Interviews
  • Survey

Data Analysis Tools

  • Case study analysis
  • coding (open to axial to selective
  • Conceptual model used as analysis framework
  • Constant comparative analysis
  • Statistical analysis

Researcher Positionality

  • Inside (studying their own programs)
  • Outside (not directly invested in the program or operations)

Research Questions

"(1) To what extent have teacher candidates learned the information described in the International Reading Association (IRA) Standards for Reading Professionals (2003, 2010) (hereafter called Standards)? (2) Do teacher candidate perceptions of learning match the signature aspects of the programs?" (p. 205).
Is this research question explicit from the manuscript? Yes

Categories

2PTI Category: Preservice teacher identity, knowledge, beliefs, attitudes, and/or orientation (ikbao) toward literacy or the teaching of literacy.

2PTP Category: Preservice teachers teaching practices (including shifts in teaching practices as a function of growth or context).

5FPP Category: Focus of the preparation program

7RPR Topic: Reading processes (eg, vocabulary)

7ASS Topic: Assessment

3CCT Category: Course content -- Content of instruction (including TE's teaching with technology) and the experiences in the course that relate to this content.

7CRP Topic: Culturally relevant and responsive pedagogy

7SOC Topic: Working with students of color

8A Topic: Findings in Need of a Category

Comments

Subscribe
Notify of
Please login to comment
0 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted

© 2015–2026 The University of Texas at Austin
Supported by the Office of Instructional Innovation
Web Privacy Policy | Web Accessibility Policy | Contact

The University of Texas at Austin College of Education

The Literacy Research Association provided pilot funding for portions of this project.

wpDiscuz
0
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x
| Reply
wpDiscuz
0
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x
| Reply