CITE-ITEL A dialogical synthesis of research into initial literacy teacher preparation
Login

A comparative examination of Canadian and American pre-service teachers’ self-efficacy beliefs for literacy instruction

Abstract

This study explored Canadian and American pre-service elementary teachers’ self-efficacy beliefs for literacy instruction, as well as the contextual factors (i.e., course and field experiences) that contribute to these self-efficacy beliefs. Survey data were collected over a two-year period at the beginning and end of a required elementary literacy methods course that assessed pre-service teachers’ self-efficacy for literacy instruction. A content analysis of the American and Canadian literacy methods course syllabi was also conducted. Paired t test results showed no significant difference in pre-service teachers’ literacy teaching self-efficacy scores from pre-test to post-test; however, there was a significant difference in the pre-service teachers’ literacy efficacy beliefs related to oral reading from the beginning to the end of the course. A weak negative correlation was found between the Canadian pre-service teachers’ total Teachers’ Sense of Efficacy for Literacy Instruction (TSELI; Tschannen-Moran & Hoy, 2011) scores and their teaching experience specific to literacy instruction, r = − .1, p = .04. There was a positive correlation between Canadian pre-service teachers’ self-efficacy scores related to engagement and differentiated instruction and their volunteer and work experiences. A positive correlation existed between Canadian and American pre-service teachers’ self-efficacy for reading/writing connections and university coursework related to literacy instruction. Implications for literacy teacher educators and recommendations for literacy instruction are discussed.

Reference

  • Ciampa, K., & Gallagher, T. L. (2018). A comparative examination of Canadian and American pre-service teachers’ self-efficacy beliefs for literacy instruction. Reading and Writing, 31(2), 457-481.

Journal

Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal

Analysis

Is this article part of a larger project or series of studies?

no

Does this study draw on a large, preexisting data set?

no

Research Approach

  • mixed methods

Geographic Setting

  • Canada
  • United States

Institutional Context

  • University based

Certification Level

  • Elementary

Programatic Focus

  • Elementary

Research Location Context

  • Literacy methods course

Preservice Participants

  • Undergraduates (university based program)

Preservice Sample Size

173

Duration of Data Collection

  • 2 years

Data Sources

  • Survey
  • Syllabi from University courses
  • TSELI survey

Data Analysis Tools

  • Content analysis
  • Correlation
  • t-test

Researcher Positionality

  • not stated

Research Questions

How do literacy teaching self-efficacy beliefs of pre-service elementary teachers in Canada and the USA change over the duration of a literacy methods course?
Is this research question explicit from the manuscript? Yes
What is the relationship between contextual classroom-level factors (i.e., literacy-related university coursework, volunteer and fieldwork experience) and self-efficacy beliefs among Canadian and American pre-service teachers?
Is this research question explicit from the manuscript? Yes

Categories

2PTP Category: Preservice teachers teaching practices (including shifts in teaching practices as a function of growth or context).

7RPR Topic: Reading processes (eg, vocabulary)

3CCE Category: Course experiences – the work that is done in a course to promote the content.

1TEP Category: Teacher educator practices.

3CCT Category: Course content -- Content of instruction (including TE's teaching with technology) and the experiences in the course that relate to this content.

Comments

Subscribe
Notify of
Please login to comment
0 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted

© 2015–2026 The University of Texas at Austin
Supported by the Office of Instructional Innovation
Web Privacy Policy | Web Accessibility Policy | Contact

The University of Texas at Austin College of Education

The Literacy Research Association provided pilot funding for portions of this project.

wpDiscuz
0
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x
| Reply
wpDiscuz
0
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x
| Reply