CITE-ITEL A dialogical synthesis of research into initial literacy teacher preparation
Login

Children’s literacy growth, and candidates’ and teachers’ professional development resulting from a PDS-based initial certification literacy course.

Abstract

This paper reports the effects on children, teacher candidates, and classroom teachers of a PDS-based initial certification course in the teaching of literacy. In this course, teacher candidates work with individual struggling readers on a range of literacy tasks, and the classroom teacher and university faculty member serve as course co-instructors. Results indicate that participating children grew more in literacy skills than non-participating children matched on beginning-of-year test scores. Candidates developed in their understanding of how assessment informs instruction, and moved from focusing on low-level skills to balancing their literacy instruction. Teachers found that serving as co-instructors resulted in significant, positive changes in their own practice, which likely contributed to children's learning. This collaborative project addresses NAPDS Essentials 2 and 8 in that university and school faculty cooperatively teach the course, preparing future educators within the context of the school community. It also tangentially addresses Essential 3, as participating teachers reported experiencing professional development as a result of their work.

Reference

  • Rosenthal, J. L., Donnantuono, M., Lebron, M., & Flynn, C. (2017). Children's literacy growth, and candidates' and teachers' professional development resulting from a PDS-based initial certification literacy course. School-University Partnerships, 10(1), 57-65. 

Journal

School-University Partnerships

Analysis

Is this article part of a larger project or series of studies?

no

Does this study draw on a large, preexisting data set?

no

Research Approach

  • mixed methods

Geographic Setting

  • New Jersey

Institutional Context

  • University based

Certification Level

  • Elementary

Programatic Focus

  • Reading

Research Location Context

  • Elementary Methods Course
  • Reading methods

Preservice Participants

  • undergraduate preservice teachers

Preservice Sample Size

48

Other Participant Data

  • Cooperating teachers
  • Students in tutorial setting
  • University instuctors

Duration of Data Collection

  • 2 academic semesters

Data Sources

  • Interviews
  • Inventories
  • lesson plans
  • Observations
  • pre-/post-assessment
  • student work
  • weekly reflections

Data Analysis Tools

  • ANOVA
  • Qualitative Analysis

Researcher Positionality

  • Inside (studying their own programs)

Research Questions

How specific PDS initiatives impact teaching practice and student learning?
Is this research question explicit from the manuscript? Combination
What is the effect of a PDS embedded undergraduate literacy course on candidates’ pedagogical knowledge development and children’s literacy growth?
Is this research question explicit from the manuscript? Combination

Categories

2PTP Category: Preservice teachers teaching practices (including shifts in teaching practices as a function of growth or context).

3CCE Category: Course experiences – the work that is done in a course to promote the content.

4FIS Category: Field Experiences: inside schools

5FPP Category: Focus of the preparation program

6GLP Category: Graduates literacy practices in classrooms

7ASS Topic: Assessment

7TUT Topic: Tutoring

7RPR Topic: Reading processes (eg, vocabulary)

7REP Topic: Reflection and the reflective practitioner

Comments

Subscribe
Notify of
Please login to comment
0 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted

© 2015–2026 The University of Texas at Austin
Supported by the Office of Instructional Innovation
Web Privacy Policy | Web Accessibility Policy | Contact

The University of Texas at Austin College of Education

The Literacy Research Association provided pilot funding for portions of this project.

wpDiscuz
0
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x
| Reply
wpDiscuz
0
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x
| Reply