CITE-ITEL A dialogical synthesis of research into initial literacy teacher preparation
Login

Watching what we say: Using video to learn about discussions

Abstract

This article considers the benefits and challenges of using English teacher candidates’ videotaped discussions of literature as tools to facilitate authentic and engaging discussions of literature. More specifically, this article examines the use of teacher candidates’ videotaped discussions in a secondary English methods course to expand candidates’ conceptions of both the purposes of discussion in the secondary English classroom and the teacher’s role in them.

Reference

  • Basmadjian, K. G. (2008). Watching what we say: Using video to learn about discussions. English Education, 41(1), 13-38.

Journal

English Education

Analysis

Is this article part of a larger project or series of studies?

no

Does this study draw on a large, preexisting data set?

no

Research Approach

  • Grounded theory
  • Qualitiative

Geographic Setting

  • Michigan State University

Institutional Context

  • University based

Certification Level

  • Secondary

Programatic Focus

  • English

Research Location Context

  • English Methods Course
  • field-based methods course

Preservice Participants

  • Undergraduates (university based program)

Preservice Sample Size

14

Other Participant Data

  • University Professor

Duration of Data Collection

  • Academic Semester

Data Sources

  • artifacts
  • Classroom Discussion
  • fieldnotes
  • Interviews
  • Observations
  • rubric-based assessment of PT lesson plans and reflections
  • Video
  • Video of preservice teacher lead discussions in field placement

Data Analysis Tools

  • Activity Theory Framework

Researcher Positionality

  • not stated

Research Questions

What are the benefits and challenges of using English teacher candidates’ videotaped discussions of literature as tools to support their learning to facilitate authentic and engaging discussions of literature?
Is this research question explicit from the manuscript? Combination
How might teacher candidates’ videotaped discussions in a secondary English methods course be used as a means of expanding their conceptions of both the purposes of discussion in the secondary English classroom and the teacher’s role in them?
Is this research question explicit from the manuscript? Combination

Categories

1TEP Category: Teacher educator practices.

2PTI Category: Preservice teacher identity, knowledge, beliefs, attitudes, and/or orientation (ikbao) toward literacy or the teaching of literacy.

2PTL Category: Preservice teachers own literacy (experiences and practices).

2PTP Category: Preservice teachers teaching practices (including shifts in teaching practices as a function of growth or context).

3CCE Category: Course experiences – the work that is done in a course to promote the content.

3CCT Category: Course content -- Content of instruction (including TE's teaching with technology) and the experiences in the course that relate to this content.

7DDA Topic: Discussion/Dialogic approaches

4FIS Category: Field Experiences: inside schools

7RES: Research

7CDL Topic: Content area literacy

7REP Topic: Reflection and the reflective practitioner

Comments

Subscribe
Notify of
Please login to comment
0 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted

© 2015–2026 The University of Texas at Austin
Supported by the Office of Instructional Innovation
Web Privacy Policy | Web Accessibility Policy | Contact

The University of Texas at Austin College of Education

The Literacy Research Association provided pilot funding for portions of this project.

wpDiscuz
0
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x
| Reply
wpDiscuz
0
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x
| Reply