CITE-ITEL A dialogical synthesis of research into initial literacy teacher preparation
Login

Teaching and learning language arts: From campus to classroom and back again

Abstract

Professional Development Schools (PDSs) can potentially affect the quality of teaching and learning of students in Grades K–16. The authors describe the collaborations among teacher education, arts and science, and K–12 classroom teacher faculties involved in a 5-year PDS partnership at Kansas State University. A 15-member language arts team examined state and national standards for teacher preparation in the context of teaching and learning English language arts in their respective settings. Qualitative results of the initiatives include a Standards in Practice model, illustrating how English language arts are addressed during the preservice teacher-preparation program. Also reported is the collaborative research of 2 university professors who examined the impact of their respective courses on 1 teacher intern, as he developed and taught a poetry lesson to his 8th- grade English students. Finally, an elementary school classroom teacher, who was also a clinical instructor, describes how the PDS partnership helped her influence change in the quality of teaching and learning English language arts, K–16.

Reference

  • Heller, M., Wood, N. J., & Shawgo, M. (2007). Teaching and learning language arts: From campus to classroom and back again, The Journal of Educational Research, 100(4), 226-234. 

Journal

Journal of Educational Research

Analysis

Is this article part of a larger project or series of studies?

no

Does this study draw on a large, preexisting data set?

no

Research Approach

  • Qualitiative

Geographic Setting

  • Kansas State University

Institutional Context

  • University based

Certification Level

  • Not stated

Programatic Focus

  • Multiple programs involved

Research Location Context

  • University

Preservice Participants

  • Undergraduates (university based program)

Preservice Sample Size

1

Other Participant Data

  • Inservice Teachers
  • University Professor

Duration of Data Collection

  • 5 years

Data Sources

  • Interviews
  • Observations
  • reflections
  • State standards
  • Syllabi from University courses

Data Analysis Tools

  • Content analysis

Researcher Positionality

  • Inside (studying their own programs)

Research Questions

What is the impact of one program on the teaching of their graduates (and their future students' learning?)
Is this research question explicit from the manuscript? No

Categories

1TEC Category: Teacher educator practices focused on institutional structures, constraints and pressures.

4FIS Category: Field Experiences: inside schools

7REP Topic: Reflection and the reflective practitioner

Comments

Subscribe
Notify of
Please login to comment
0 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted

© 2015–2026 The University of Texas at Austin
Supported by the Office of Instructional Innovation
Web Privacy Policy | Web Accessibility Policy | Contact

The University of Texas at Austin College of Education

The Literacy Research Association provided pilot funding for portions of this project.

wpDiscuz
0
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x
| Reply
wpDiscuz
0
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x
| Reply