CITE-ITEL A dialogical synthesis of research into initial literacy teacher preparation
Login

(Re)designing literacy teacher education: a call for change

Abstract

The article features a graduate literacy teacher education course that compelled

students to think in terms of design and multimodality. In an effort to innovate

our own literacy teacher education work, we came together to devise a course

that encouraged students to adopt a design lens to their thinking, planning, and

assessing of literacy learning. We saw this qualitative case study as a way to

understand the interrelationships of learning processes, principles of design and

multimodal texts, and how these might inform pedagogy. Building on years of

work in the areas of multimodality and multiliteracies, we observed how eight

teachers with varying degrees of comfort with multimodality moved into a

design-oriented approach to literacy education. The article presents our research

on design-oriented teacher education work, but the findings illuminate how the

adoption and inhabiting of different mindsets and metalanguage can make a difference.

Reference

  • McLean, C. A., & Rowsell, J. (2013). (Re) designing literacy teacher education: a call for change. Teaching Education, 24(1), 1-26.

Journal

Teaching Education

Analysis

Is this article part of a larger project or series of studies?

no

Does this study draw on a large, preexisting data set?

no

Research Approach

  • Case study
  • Qualitiative

Geographic Setting

  • northeast US

Institutional Context

  • University based

Certification Level

  • Not stated

Programatic Focus

  • Literacy Education

Research Location Context

  • University

Preservice Participants

  • Graduate and undergraduate

Preservice Sample Size

2

Duration of Data Collection

  • 7 six-hour sessions

Data Sources

  • fieldnotes
  • Focus group interviews
  • Interviews
  • lesson plans
  • Photographs
  • Researcher journals
  • student work
  • Video

Data Analysis Tools

  • Content analysis
  • Thematic analysis

Researcher Positionality

  • inside (staying their own students)

Research Questions

What does a design-based approach to teaching look like?
Is this research question explicit from the manuscript? Yes
How does a design-oriented approach to teaching transform teachers’ understanding of what it means to learn and teach?
Is this research question explicit from the manuscript? Yes
"Four subresearch questions allowed us to explore the overarching questions: (1) What are the skills, discourses, and composition processes involved in designing multimodal texts and instruction? (2) To what extent do teachers use a language of design to represent their pedagogy? Downloaded by [University of Texas Libraries] at 09:30 12 June 2015 (3) How does design literacy shape teachers’ pedagogical literacy instruction? (4) How can teachers reconcile design literacies with more traditional notions of literacy?" (p. 4)
Is this research question explicit from the manuscript? Yes

Categories

2PTL Category: Preservice teachers own literacy (experiences and practices).

2PTI Category: Preservice teacher identity, knowledge, beliefs, attitudes, and/or orientation (ikbao) toward literacy or the teaching of literacy.

3CCE Category: Course experiences – the work that is done in a course to promote the content.

7MMD Topic: Multimodality

2PTP Category: Preservice teachers teaching practices (including shifts in teaching practices as a function of growth or context).

7REP Topic: Reflection and the reflective practitioner

Comments

Subscribe
Notify of
Please login to comment
0 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted

© 2015–2026 The University of Texas at Austin
Supported by the Office of Instructional Innovation
Web Privacy Policy | Web Accessibility Policy | Contact

The University of Texas at Austin College of Education

The Literacy Research Association provided pilot funding for portions of this project.

wpDiscuz
0
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x
| Reply
wpDiscuz
0
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x
| Reply